Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Chuck Holton is an American war correspondent, published author, and motivational speaker.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
INCELs Strike Again

Old Problem, New Threat

And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Genesis 1:28

They call themselves INCELS, or “Involuntary celibates — young men depressed by their inability to get a girlfriend. This is not a new phenomenon…after all, men have lamented their inability to snag a mate since time immemorial. When I was in school, the inability to hook up with a member of the opposite sex was probably the norm, not the exception. I guess most of us could have called ourselves “INCELS” at one time or another.

From H. Michael Karshis
But now something’s changed. The internet allows many of these guys to turn to pornography and violent video games to soothe their frustration. So much time online takes them deep into a toxic mix of loneliness and isolation.

Jared Reed is an Associate Pastor at Granite Hills Baptist Church in Reno, Nevada. When I sat down with him to discuss this issue, he said very directly, “Look, this is a problem across the country, but I believe our area is especially bad. We have so many young guys who are addicted to porn, video games, and social media. It is undoubtedly a form of slavery.”

“We’re not talking about a fun thing to do with somebody physically sitting next to you for a few minutes on a rainy afternoon,” He continued. “We’re talking about weeks poured into an immersive environment, and at a very high cost.” Reed went on to relate a story of one man who was spending as much of his limited income on video games every month as he was on rent. That’s a problem.

Young men are increasingly hanging out with friends in the virtual world via massive multiplayer online games more than they are spending time with people in the real world, “meatspace,” as some call it. Online, they can form teams, explore and conquer worlds, shoot bad guys, pilot or parachute from planes, all without leaving the well-padded, air-conditioned comfort of their bedrooms.

The Author at age ~10
When I was a kid we’d go exploring, conquering, fighting and such too. We called it “playing outside.” Believe me, the graphics were incredible. Zero-latency.

But today’s young men are not allowed to do that, even if they wanted to. A report investigating the relationship between exposure to nature and mental health1 found that the average distance a young man is allowed to roam from his home unsupervised in 2020 is only about 300 yards. Most Americans spend 93% of their time indoors! Contrast that to my grandfather’s generation, which according to this report spent more time outdoors than in, walked most everywhere and roamed up to six miles away from home unsupervised.

When I was a kid, I rode my bike everywhere. It was about four miles to our church and a little more to my best friend Shane’s house. Between going to school, doing my paper route, and visiting friends I easily racked up ten miles a day or more on my old BMX.

Today’s kids are barely allowed to leave their front lawn. Many parents would say that’s because of the threat of abduction. Some whack job or pervert is likely to grab their kid off the street and murder him. Only that’s not borne out by the data. According to a report from the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, of the 73.9 million children in America, only about a hundred of those are kidnapped each year by someone unknown to them. Ninety-three percent of those are eventually returned alive to their families. That means a kid in America today has a 0.00000014 chance of being kidnapped and murdered by some rando while out playing unsupervised. A kid is 1,600 times more likely to drown than be abducted.

But the mere perception of danger is enough for many American parents to treat their kids like useless toy poodles and keep them indoors, drive them anywhere they need to go, and as a result, make them much more likely to be obese, isolated, and antisocial.

Human beings were created for physical touch. We thrive on it. From breastfeeding to kissing to handshakes to wrestling to the very act of procreation, we are hard-wired to need human touch. Babies who are not held and cuddled often fail to thrive. Marriages fail, too, when there is no intimacy. Everyone needs touch.

But INCELS very often live their lives devoid of physical interaction of any kind. Their lives are spent online, connected to the entire world like never before but starving for love and physical affection. To make matters worse, they are almost universally addicted to porn, which cruelly forces them into the role of spectators to the most intimate of human touch, a constant reminder of what they don’t have. This creates in them a profound level of anger and self-loathing.

22-year-old self-described INCEL (name withheld) went on a killing spree in Isla Vista, California in 2014 to punish women who would not go out with him.
They begin to resent the world of “normies,” those people they see at school or in town who appear to have everything. They begin to hate “Chads,” who personify men who are perhaps richer or more attractive than they are, and “Stacys,” the “shallow” women who partner with them.

These INCEL men end up congregating in online chat groups at places like 4chan, and sort of stew in their own juices. They complain to each other about the inability to find a partner, about how shallow women are, and convince each other that they have a right to the kind of circus-act sexual trysts they see in pornographic movies. And because their world doesn’t readily offer up those opportunities, they come to believe the world deserves to be punished.

This is where things get dangerous.

Mark Lundgren is a former FBI agent who has been tracking this phenomenon. As we discussed it one day, he told me, “INCELS are made up of mostly white younger men who have sort of descended into a dark place on the internet, an echo chamber that is reverberating with a toxic ideology. They don’t think anything’s going to change in the world. They are extremely nihilistic and believe society needs to be punished. It’s a movement we’re seeing rise up much more significantly than we have in the past.”

Indeed we are. The FBI has identified at least four active violence attacks and forty-five deaths in the past few years that have been carried out by men adhering to INCEL ideology.

In 2014, a man identifying with the INCEL movement killed six and injured fourteen in Isla Vista, California. Before going on his rampage, he wrote, “I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires all because girls have never been attracted to me.” He went on to say, “One day INCELS will realize their true strength and numbers, and will overthrow this oppressive feminist system. Start envisioning a world where WOMEN FEAR YOU.”

In 2015, a 26-year-old INCEL murdered nine people and wounded others before committing suicide at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon. He, too, lamented his inability to get a girl.

In 2017, an INCEL killed two students at a high school in New Mexico before killing himself. Before the event, he wrote, “Work sucks, school sucks, life sucks. I just want out of this [expletive].”

The massacre of 17 high schoolers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, happened on Valentine’s Day, and not for no reason. The shooter has become the poster boy for many in the INCEL movement.

A mass shooting was thwarted in January 2019 in Provo, Utah, after a 27-year-old man posted the following on his social media account, “I’ve never had a girlfriend before and I’m still a virgin, this is why I’m planning on shooting up a public place soon and being the next mass shooter cause I’m ready to die and all the girls the [sic] turned me down is going to make it right by killings as many girls as I see.”

Aside from their obvious failures with women, how many of these guys do you think got zero hugs and pats on the back at home? How many of them would you think were heavily into violent video games? How many were addicted to online porn? If you guessed all of them, you’d be right.

But these kinds of addictions aren’t just the domain of unemployed losers who are one step from plunging over the brink. In our interview, Pastor Jared said, “Of the men I’ve counseled over the past five years, I cannot recall one for whom pornography isn’t a struggle. And we’re not just talking about young single men. I’ve counseled men from 17 to 75 who were struggling with porn addiction.”

Two young men from his church agreed to share their journey away from these addictions with me. Carson and Allen (not their real names) both struggled with video games and porn addiction.

Carson, age 37 and now married told me, “Video games definitely make you more reclusive, just by their nature, and made me less sociable. With pornography I’d say looking back it gave me unbelievably high expectations that no woman would be able to achieve.”

His buddy Austin, age 20 said of the games he used to play, “It’s all violence. And for me, a lot of those video games they make you angry. And you might play for a couple of hours and maybe you don’t win and you just…it just leaves me mad and it just kind of sets the tone for the rest of the day.”

This underscores why human interaction and especially human touch are so important. Mark Lundgren agreed. “Without community surrounding us,” he said, “We can go so deep into the internet, so isolated, so without hope, so dark and that I think can absolutely be a tool of strategic evil when it’s not checked.”

Jared agreed 100%. “The real change seems to happen when they are ready to get radical about dealing with this sin, putting it to death,” he said, paraphrasing Colossians 3:5. “Men who make the changes, who start to experience victory in this area, it’s a wonderful snowball.”

He’s right. Unlike Heracles and his new pet Cerberus, it’s not enough to try to chain up your hidden sins. A man of prowess must go all in. He must tear out and throw into the fire those things that cause him to give in. He must hunt down his weaknesses and kill them by embracing hardship in this life.

Fortunately, a man submitted to the Holy Spirit has help in this endeavor. Carson put it this way: “I gave my life to Christ, and I couldn’t do any of those things anymore. It completely purged me of my pornography addiction, my alcohol addiction, I completely lost interest in all my video games.”

Not every man will have such a black-and-white experience. I’ve been saved for decades and still struggle with besetting sins. Engaging the enemy of our own weakness is a daily battle every man must fight. In so doing, we will undoubtedly have a few setbacks now and then, but we never lose unless we stop fighting. The Apostle Paul knew what that was like, when he wrote, “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.” (2 Timothy 4:7)

My book Prowess — The Man You Were Meant To Be is for those of us who are still in the fight. It’s a manual to help you learn how to win in very practical, down-to-earth ways. The book is primarily aimed at the young lions who often approach me after a speaking engagement with questions about how to do manhood right. But even if you aren’t a young lion, it’s good to remember the really important things now and then.

This article is an excerpt of the book “Prowess — The Man You Were Meant To Be” by Chuck Holton

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Rubio rocks!

Marco Rubio goes full Ayn Rand and it is glorious.

00:02:57
Update From Croatia

From yesterday*

I appreciate all of you supporting the hot zone. Thank you for being here.

How do you think this is all going to end?

00:03:39
Ukraine Safeguarding its Troops with Technology

If you have wondered why Russia is losing so many men and Ukraine is not, this will help explain it. Russia is sending men into the front lines where they are killed by drone operators from Ukraine who are hundreds of miles away from the front lines.

00:02:17
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Exclusive Live Call with Chuck This Saturday

Saturday, August 22 at 12:00 p.m. New York time

First, thank you so much for supporting us here on Locals. This Saturday, Chuck is doing an exclusive live call with this community, and we’d love to talk with you.

We just finished our first Frontier Forge camp and are now working toward buying a new building for the camp. Chuck is also currently in California and recently went on The 700 Club to talk about his new book, Red Teams.

So bring your questions. Ask about Frontier Forge, the new building, California, Red Teams, current events, or whatever else is on your mind.

This call is exclusively for this community as a thank you for your support. We can’t wait to actually talk with you all in person.

Drop your questions below and let us know if you’ll be there!

post photo preview

"Having many things to write to you, I did not wish to do so with paper and ink; but I hope to come to you and speak face to face, that our joy may be full."
(2 John 1:12)

Face-to-face connection is what the Lord created us for—first between us and Him, and second, between one another. Discussions behind keyboards have a time and a place, but we are relational creatures. We communicate not just through words and sentences, but through our body language, tone of voice, and the timing of our speech and responses. Personally, I strongly dislike any communication where we cannot at least hear each other's voice. To me, that is vital for understanding my neighbors and responding accordingly.

This technological age has made us humans lazy. Text-based communication is much more convenient, and it is easier to deal with others because there is no pressure to respond in real time. Instead, you can take hours to craft messages, choosing what to ignore and what to respond to, if you even respond at ...

Prayers needed also for Nigerian Christians 🙏✝️✡️🕎⬆️⚖️✝️🇳🇬”27 Killed as Nigeria’s Christian Genocide Escalates” CBN News

post photo preview
The Wars Are Merging, and the West Is Running Out of Room for Error

 

Iran is behaving less like a defeated power than a government convinced it can outlast the West, while Russia continues pressing NATO and Israel signals that it may be prepared to finish what Washington started. Increasingly, these conflicts look like parts of the same war.

By Chuck Holton

The news from the Middle East and Europe is becoming harder to divide into separate stories. Iran is under severe military and economic pressure but continues to act aggressively. Russia is supporting Tehran while prosecuting its war against Ukraine. NATO is increasingly concerned about the possibility of a direct confrontation with Moscow, and Israel is openly signaling that its campaign against the Iranian regime may not be finished.

Taken individually, each development is serious. Taken together, they point toward something much larger: the conflicts involving Iran, Russia, Israel, Ukraine, Europe and the United States are increasingly interconnected, while the West remains dangerously reluctant to acknowledge what that means.

President Donald Trump said this week that there are no talks or conversations scheduled with the Islamic Republic of Iran and that the naval blockade remains in effect. Yet Iran is hardly behaving like a country that considers itself beaten. Iranian officials have begun speaking about the war in the past tense and portraying the outcome as a victory that has established Iran as a dominant regional power.

That rhetoric would be easier to dismiss if Tehran were simultaneously showing signs of military submission. Instead, according to the developments covered in Wednesday's broadcast, Iran launched missiles and drones against the United Arab Emirates. The UAE subsequently announced that trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran had been halted until further notice. Because the UAE had remained an important outlet for Iranian commerce despite the blockade, the decision could impose substantial additional economic pressure on Tehran.

Iran has undoubtedly suffered military damage. Its naval and air capabilities have been degraded, and its ability to manufacture weapons has been disrupted. But degraded is not the same as destroyed. Iran retains significant manpower and, critically, continues to possess the ability to produce drones and missiles. Drone production is especially difficult to eliminate because comparatively simple systems can be manufactured in dispersed facilities without the enormous industrial infrastructure required for sophisticated aircraft or warships.

The other problem is that Iran is not operating alone. Russia has reportedly continued providing Iran with military equipment and components, including shipments as recently as late July. Moscow has several reasons to want Tehran to survive. Iran consumes American attention and resources, creates additional problems for Washington's allies and contributes to instability that can help keep global oil prices elevated—a considerable advantage for an economy such as Russia's that depends heavily on energy exports.

The relationship runs both ways. Russia and Iran have supported one another while confronting different parts of the Western alliance, and that makes it increasingly misleading to analyze Ukraine and the Middle East as entirely separate conflicts. The same governments are appearing on the same sides, exchanging resources and benefiting strategically from one another's wars.

Israel Is Sending a Different Message

While Washington appears hesitant about its next move, Israel's rhetoric suggests preparation for further action. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his government has a structured plan containing "many surprises" designed to undermine the Iranian regime and enable change. He also directly addressed members of the Revolutionary Guard, warning that those who continue participating in the regime's repression are in Israel's sights while telling those who lay down their weapons that they would not be harmed.

Netanyahu then addressed the Iranian people themselves, saying Israel does not seek Iran's destruction or division but wants to see the country liberated from tyranny and eventually restored to peaceful relations with Israel. His language sounded less like the conclusion of a military campaign than preparation for another phase of it.

That creates an increasingly important question for Washington. President Trump has repeatedly used strong rhetoric about the consequences Iran would face if it continued its belligerence. Iran has continued its belligerence, yet the United States has not carried out major new strikes in recent weeks. Deterrence depends not simply on possessing military power but on convincing an adversary that stated consequences are credible. Every threat that goes unenforced makes the next threat easier to ignore.

Israel may therefore conclude that it cannot wait indefinitely for the United States. Netanyahu's remarks strongly suggest that his government has additional targets and plans already prepared. Whether Washington participates, assists indirectly or simply gets out of the way could become one of the defining strategic decisions of the next phase of the conflict.

NATO and Russia Move Closer to Confrontation

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Supporters Only Content
What Iranians Really Think About This War

In this special interview, I sit down with an Iranian software engineer and anti-IRGC activist living in the UK who shares a perspective few people in the West ever hear. We discuss the growing opposition to the Iranian regime, what ordinary Iranians think about the current war, why many no longer support the Islamic Republic, and what could happen if the regime eventually falls. Whether you agree with every conclusion or not, this conversation offers a rare firsthand look into how one Iranian dissident views his country's future.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Threat Against Trump Is Worse Than We Knew
An Iranian plot, a dramatic Air Force One deception, and America’s dangerous race to catch up on drone defense

The threat environment around President Donald Trump has reached a level I have never seen before—and new reporting about what happened during his trip to Turkey shows just how serious it has become.

When Trump left Ankara after meeting with NATO leaders on July 8, the public was initially told that he had used an older Air Force One for nostalgic reasons. Then we heard that the newer aircraft was unavailable. After that, reports suggested that security concerns had influenced the decision.

Now we are learning that the situation was much more dramatic.

According to new reporting, American and Israeli intelligence had picked up a credible Iranian threat against the president’s aircraft. The danger was considered serious enough that the Secret Service and the military carried out the kind of deception you would expect to see in a Hollywood thriller.

Trump boarded the older Air Force One with members of the press pool and his staff. Everyone aboard was reportedly instructed to close the window shades. A catering truck then pulled alongside the aircraft as though it were delivering food.

Instead, the president got into the truck.

The vehicle carried him across the tarmac to a smaller, less conspicuous government aircraft—a C-32A—which then flew him out of Ankara. Many of the people traveling with him apparently did not know what was happening until later.

Think about that for a moment. The president of the United States had to slip off Air Force One in a catering vehicle and leave a NATO summit aboard a smaller decoy aircraft because the Iranian threat was considered credible enough that officials feared his plane could be attacked.

That tells us at least two things. First, Iran’s threats against President Trump cannot be dismissed as empty propaganda. Second, the United States cannot afford to assume that every NATO ally can provide a secure operating environment simply because its flag appears on the right list in Washington.

Israel reportedly helped identify the threat. If that intelligence contributed to getting the president home alive, Americans ought to remember it.

Why Are Missile Batteries Guarding a Golf Course?

The extraordinary precautions did not end in Turkey.

Recent images from Trump’s golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, show Avenger short-range air-defense systems positioned nearby and surrounded by concertina wire. These Humvee-mounted systems carry Stinger missiles and a .50-caliber machine gun.

That is not normal golf-course scenery.

The Avenger is designed to protect troops and critical assets from low-flying aircraft, helicopters, and other aerial threats. If officials are deploying that kind of equipment while the president plays golf, they are not worried only about a hobbyist accidentally flying a DJI drone into restricted airspace.

They are preparing for the possibility of a deliberate attack.

The obvious threat is a small commercial or homemade drone modified to carry explosives. These aircraft can fly low, move quickly, and approach from directions that make them difficult to detect. They are also cheap. That creates an ugly economic problem: firing a Stinger missile costing hundreds of thousands of dollars at a drone worth a few hundred or a few thousand dollars is wildly inefficient.

But if that drone is headed toward the president, nobody is going to worry about the price of the missile.

The harder problem is engagement range. A small drone can be difficult to detect and hit before it gets close enough for an explosion—or even falling debris—to injure the person being protected. A manually aimed machine gun is not an ideal answer to a dinner-plate-sized target moving at highway speed. Missiles also have practical limitations at very short distances.

That is why presidential protection now requires a layered counter-drone system: radar and other sensors to detect the aircraft, electronic systems to disrupt or seize control of it, directed-energy weapons to damage its electronics, and kinetic weapons as the final line of defense.

After the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania—where the attacker had reportedly flown a drone over the venue before climbing onto a roof—the Secret Service accelerated its counter-drone efforts. That was necessary, but it also revealed how far behind the United States had allowed itself to fall.

The Drone War Is Already Here

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals