Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Chuck Holton is an American war correspondent, published author, and motivational speaker.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
INCELs Strike Again

Old Problem, New Threat

And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Genesis 1:28

They call themselves INCELS, or “Involuntary celibates — young men depressed by their inability to get a girlfriend. This is not a new phenomenon…after all, men have lamented their inability to snag a mate since time immemorial. When I was in school, the inability to hook up with a member of the opposite sex was probably the norm, not the exception. I guess most of us could have called ourselves “INCELS” at one time or another.

From H. Michael Karshis
But now something’s changed. The internet allows many of these guys to turn to pornography and violent video games to soothe their frustration. So much time online takes them deep into a toxic mix of loneliness and isolation.

Jared Reed is an Associate Pastor at Granite Hills Baptist Church in Reno, Nevada. When I sat down with him to discuss this issue, he said very directly, “Look, this is a problem across the country, but I believe our area is especially bad. We have so many young guys who are addicted to porn, video games, and social media. It is undoubtedly a form of slavery.”

“We’re not talking about a fun thing to do with somebody physically sitting next to you for a few minutes on a rainy afternoon,” He continued. “We’re talking about weeks poured into an immersive environment, and at a very high cost.” Reed went on to relate a story of one man who was spending as much of his limited income on video games every month as he was on rent. That’s a problem.

Young men are increasingly hanging out with friends in the virtual world via massive multiplayer online games more than they are spending time with people in the real world, “meatspace,” as some call it. Online, they can form teams, explore and conquer worlds, shoot bad guys, pilot or parachute from planes, all without leaving the well-padded, air-conditioned comfort of their bedrooms.

The Author at age ~10
When I was a kid we’d go exploring, conquering, fighting and such too. We called it “playing outside.” Believe me, the graphics were incredible. Zero-latency.

But today’s young men are not allowed to do that, even if they wanted to. A report investigating the relationship between exposure to nature and mental health1 found that the average distance a young man is allowed to roam from his home unsupervised in 2020 is only about 300 yards. Most Americans spend 93% of their time indoors! Contrast that to my grandfather’s generation, which according to this report spent more time outdoors than in, walked most everywhere and roamed up to six miles away from home unsupervised.

When I was a kid, I rode my bike everywhere. It was about four miles to our church and a little more to my best friend Shane’s house. Between going to school, doing my paper route, and visiting friends I easily racked up ten miles a day or more on my old BMX.

Today’s kids are barely allowed to leave their front lawn. Many parents would say that’s because of the threat of abduction. Some whack job or pervert is likely to grab their kid off the street and murder him. Only that’s not borne out by the data. According to a report from the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, of the 73.9 million children in America, only about a hundred of those are kidnapped each year by someone unknown to them. Ninety-three percent of those are eventually returned alive to their families. That means a kid in America today has a 0.00000014 chance of being kidnapped and murdered by some rando while out playing unsupervised. A kid is 1,600 times more likely to drown than be abducted.

But the mere perception of danger is enough for many American parents to treat their kids like useless toy poodles and keep them indoors, drive them anywhere they need to go, and as a result, make them much more likely to be obese, isolated, and antisocial.

Human beings were created for physical touch. We thrive on it. From breastfeeding to kissing to handshakes to wrestling to the very act of procreation, we are hard-wired to need human touch. Babies who are not held and cuddled often fail to thrive. Marriages fail, too, when there is no intimacy. Everyone needs touch.

But INCELS very often live their lives devoid of physical interaction of any kind. Their lives are spent online, connected to the entire world like never before but starving for love and physical affection. To make matters worse, they are almost universally addicted to porn, which cruelly forces them into the role of spectators to the most intimate of human touch, a constant reminder of what they don’t have. This creates in them a profound level of anger and self-loathing.

22-year-old self-described INCEL (name withheld) went on a killing spree in Isla Vista, California in 2014 to punish women who would not go out with him.
They begin to resent the world of “normies,” those people they see at school or in town who appear to have everything. They begin to hate “Chads,” who personify men who are perhaps richer or more attractive than they are, and “Stacys,” the “shallow” women who partner with them.

These INCEL men end up congregating in online chat groups at places like 4chan, and sort of stew in their own juices. They complain to each other about the inability to find a partner, about how shallow women are, and convince each other that they have a right to the kind of circus-act sexual trysts they see in pornographic movies. And because their world doesn’t readily offer up those opportunities, they come to believe the world deserves to be punished.

This is where things get dangerous.

Mark Lundgren is a former FBI agent who has been tracking this phenomenon. As we discussed it one day, he told me, “INCELS are made up of mostly white younger men who have sort of descended into a dark place on the internet, an echo chamber that is reverberating with a toxic ideology. They don’t think anything’s going to change in the world. They are extremely nihilistic and believe society needs to be punished. It’s a movement we’re seeing rise up much more significantly than we have in the past.”

Indeed we are. The FBI has identified at least four active violence attacks and forty-five deaths in the past few years that have been carried out by men adhering to INCEL ideology.

In 2014, a man identifying with the INCEL movement killed six and injured fourteen in Isla Vista, California. Before going on his rampage, he wrote, “I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires all because girls have never been attracted to me.” He went on to say, “One day INCELS will realize their true strength and numbers, and will overthrow this oppressive feminist system. Start envisioning a world where WOMEN FEAR YOU.”

In 2015, a 26-year-old INCEL murdered nine people and wounded others before committing suicide at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon. He, too, lamented his inability to get a girl.

In 2017, an INCEL killed two students at a high school in New Mexico before killing himself. Before the event, he wrote, “Work sucks, school sucks, life sucks. I just want out of this [expletive].”

The massacre of 17 high schoolers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, happened on Valentine’s Day, and not for no reason. The shooter has become the poster boy for many in the INCEL movement.

A mass shooting was thwarted in January 2019 in Provo, Utah, after a 27-year-old man posted the following on his social media account, “I’ve never had a girlfriend before and I’m still a virgin, this is why I’m planning on shooting up a public place soon and being the next mass shooter cause I’m ready to die and all the girls the [sic] turned me down is going to make it right by killings as many girls as I see.”

Aside from their obvious failures with women, how many of these guys do you think got zero hugs and pats on the back at home? How many of them would you think were heavily into violent video games? How many were addicted to online porn? If you guessed all of them, you’d be right.

But these kinds of addictions aren’t just the domain of unemployed losers who are one step from plunging over the brink. In our interview, Pastor Jared said, “Of the men I’ve counseled over the past five years, I cannot recall one for whom pornography isn’t a struggle. And we’re not just talking about young single men. I’ve counseled men from 17 to 75 who were struggling with porn addiction.”

Two young men from his church agreed to share their journey away from these addictions with me. Carson and Allen (not their real names) both struggled with video games and porn addiction.

Carson, age 37 and now married told me, “Video games definitely make you more reclusive, just by their nature, and made me less sociable. With pornography I’d say looking back it gave me unbelievably high expectations that no woman would be able to achieve.”

His buddy Austin, age 20 said of the games he used to play, “It’s all violence. And for me, a lot of those video games they make you angry. And you might play for a couple of hours and maybe you don’t win and you just…it just leaves me mad and it just kind of sets the tone for the rest of the day.”

This underscores why human interaction and especially human touch are so important. Mark Lundgren agreed. “Without community surrounding us,” he said, “We can go so deep into the internet, so isolated, so without hope, so dark and that I think can absolutely be a tool of strategic evil when it’s not checked.”

Jared agreed 100%. “The real change seems to happen when they are ready to get radical about dealing with this sin, putting it to death,” he said, paraphrasing Colossians 3:5. “Men who make the changes, who start to experience victory in this area, it’s a wonderful snowball.”

He’s right. Unlike Heracles and his new pet Cerberus, it’s not enough to try to chain up your hidden sins. A man of prowess must go all in. He must tear out and throw into the fire those things that cause him to give in. He must hunt down his weaknesses and kill them by embracing hardship in this life.

Fortunately, a man submitted to the Holy Spirit has help in this endeavor. Carson put it this way: “I gave my life to Christ, and I couldn’t do any of those things anymore. It completely purged me of my pornography addiction, my alcohol addiction, I completely lost interest in all my video games.”

Not every man will have such a black-and-white experience. I’ve been saved for decades and still struggle with besetting sins. Engaging the enemy of our own weakness is a daily battle every man must fight. In so doing, we will undoubtedly have a few setbacks now and then, but we never lose unless we stop fighting. The Apostle Paul knew what that was like, when he wrote, “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.” (2 Timothy 4:7)

My book Prowess — The Man You Were Meant To Be is for those of us who are still in the fight. It’s a manual to help you learn how to win in very practical, down-to-earth ways. The book is primarily aimed at the young lions who often approach me after a speaking engagement with questions about how to do manhood right. But even if you aren’t a young lion, it’s good to remember the really important things now and then.

This article is an excerpt of the book “Prowess — The Man You Were Meant To Be” by Chuck Holton

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Live Call Recording: April 25, 2026

Thank you all for joining us this month on our Live call. I love getting to see your faces and have real conversations with you all.

What was your favorite moment or topic from this call?

01:25:31
Israel Makes a Commercial from its Critics

Love this.

00:00:49
Pahlavi Speaks Out Against Leftist Journalists

The Prince hits back at the spectacularly one-sided coverage the war is getting in Europe. Powerful stuff.

00:04:24
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

There is a lot happening in the world right now and most people are not getting the full picture

What is one issue you believe people are completely misunderstanding

And how has what we cover here changed the way you see it

Our new nature cannot sin, for we've been born again of Him who knew no sin (1 John 3:9) — it's our unredeemed nature (the flesh/body) that is still weak and corrupted. For Jesus became like us so that we could become like Him in God's righteousness (2 Corinthians 5:21, Colossians 3:10). So then, to walk in the Holy Spirit is to also walk in our new man in Christ (Ephesians 2:10, 4:24). For it's the Spirit who gave birth to our new spirit (John 3:6); and who has reconciled us to God spiritually, by joining us to the Lord in one spirit (1 Corinthians 6:17).

Hi Chuck and Connie,

When is your next tour in Panama that will not be too physically demanding? We love going for walks, but my husband has a bad ankle, so hills are out of the question.

Please let me know.

Thank you,
Jane Bobbitt😀

post photo preview
The Illusion of Control in a War That’s Anything But Controlled

When you spend enough time around conflict—real conflict, not the sanitized version filtered through headlines—you begin to recognize a pattern that most people miss.

At the beginning of almost every war, there is a moment when one side appears to be in control. The strikes are precise, the objectives are clear, and the narrative is simple enough for public consumption. It looks organized. It looks deliberate. It looks like someone, somewhere, has a plan. But that moment never lasts. And what we are seeing right now is the beginning of that shift.

What Looks Stable… Usually Isn’t

From a distance, the situation appears manageable. Military assets are being deployed with precision, targets are being hit, and responses are being measured—at least on the surface. But stability in war is often an illusion. Because what you’re really looking at is not control—it’s timing. Timing between actions. Timing between responses. Timing between decisions that haven’t yet been made. And once that timing breaks down, everything changes. That’s when a conflict stops being predictable and starts becoming dangerous in ways that no one can fully control.

The Problem With Modern Warfare

One of the biggest misconceptions people have about modern conflict is that technological superiority guarantees a clean outcome. It doesn’t. What it does is create the appearance of control. Precision weapons, intelligence gathering, satellite surveillance—all of these tools allow a military to operate with incredible effectiveness in the early stages. But they do not eliminate uncertainty. In many ways, they simply push it further down the timeline. Because war is not just about destroying targets. It’s about influencing behavior. And behavior is far harder to predict than infrastructure.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
This War Isn’t Slowing Down—And That Changes Everything

In a recent briefing, President Donald Trump made something unmistakably clear: this war is not operating on a timeline, and it is not approaching a natural pause. Instead, it is accelerating in both scope and intensity, moving beyond limited strikes into a sustained campaign that is beginning to reshape the strategic landscape of the Middle East in real time.

That reality alone should force a reassessment of how this conflict is being understood, because what may have initially appeared to be a short, decisive military operation is now evolving into something far more complex, with consequences that extend well beyond the immediate battlefield.

From Targeted Strikes to Sustained Pressure

The early phase of the war was defined by overwhelming force, as the United States and its allies executed a series of large-scale precision strikes against Iranian military infrastructure. Thousands of targets were hit, including missile systems, naval assets, and weapons production facilities, resulting in the significant degradation of Iran’s conventional military capabilities.

In addition to the air campaign, the United States implemented a sweeping naval blockade designed to isolate Iran economically and militarily, effectively placing the entirety of its coastline under surveillance and control.

At first glance, these actions created the impression of a decisive and controlled campaign, one in which the outcome seemed largely predetermined by the imbalance of military power.

But wars are rarely decided in their opening phase.

A War That Has Moved to the Sea

What has emerged more recently—and what the latest developments highlight—is a shift toward a more dangerous and unpredictable phase centered on maritime conflict.

The Strait of Hormuz, one of the most strategically critical waterways in the world, has become a focal point of confrontation, with Iranian forces targeting commercial vessels and attempting to disrupt global shipping lanes. In response, the United States has escalated its posture, ordering naval forces to take direct and lethal action against Iranian boats engaged in mine-laying operations.

This directive represents more than a tactical adjustment; it signals a transition into a more aggressive and persistent form of engagement, one that increases the likelihood of miscalculation and rapid escalation.

The presence of multiple U.S. warships, aircraft, and mine-clearing operations in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation, as does the growing number of incidents involving attacks on commercial shipping.

What is unfolding in the Strait is not a sideshow—it is a central front in a conflict that now directly impacts global trade and energy markets.

Why Dominance Does Not Equal Resolution

Despite the clear military advantage held by the United States, there are signs that the conflict is entering a phase where superiority alone may not be enough to achieve a decisive outcome.

Iran’s naval capabilities have been severely degraded, and a large portion of its military infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed.

And yet, the continued ability of Iranian forces to disrupt shipping, deploy mines, and conduct asymmetric attacks reveals a deeper truth about modern warfare: even a weakened adversary can remain dangerous when it adapts its strategy.

This is particularly evident in the use of small, fast-attack boats and decentralized tactics, which allow Iran to operate in ways that are difficult to fully counter through conventional means.

In other words, the battlefield has shifted from one of direct confrontation to one of persistent disruption.

The Strategic Stakes Are Global

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Live Call With Chuck Link
What Do YOU Want To Ask Chuck?

Tomorrow at 12:00 PM New York time, we are going live with Chuck for our supporter call.

So let me ask you this… what do YOU want to ask Chuck? What’s been on your mind after these last few episodes? What do you want clarity on? What are you not hearing answered anywhere else?

Drop your questions in the comments here or go back to the original post and add them there.

We’re going through all of them and pulling the best ones for the call. Don’t hold back; we can talk openly in these calls. 


Join the call here: https://meet.google.com/iqr-tope-rqz

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals