Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
‘I Repent a Thousand Times’
Migrants Who Left Prosperous Lives to Chase the American Dream Now Head South Again
February 23, 2025
post photo preview

Source: La Prensa, Panama

Karla Castillo thought she was making the right choice when she left Chile, where she had built a stable life over five years, to chase the dream of a better future in the United States. Now, with tears in her eyes, she says, “I repent a thousand times.”

Castillo, a 36-year-old Venezuelan and single mother of four, had work, security, and a community in Chile. But the possibility of making more money in the U.S. lured her into the treacherous journey north. She spent time in Venezuela before making her way through the Darién Gap, one of the world’s most dangerous migration routes.

“It was a bad decision,” she admits. “I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone. It’s the worst experience. You see everything—dead bodies, rapes, robberies. They grope you, they touch you.”

In Mexico, Castillo became a victim of a kidnapping attempt. Her plan was to reach the U.S. and then bring her children, but when border restrictions tightened, she found herself stranded. Now, she is on her way back—first to Venezuela, then hopefully back to Chile, where she once had a job as a nanny with “excellent bosses” who still keep in touch with her.

A Journey Fueled by Economic Aspirations, Not Asylum Claims

Castillo’s story is not unique. Many of the migrants now making the reverse journey south originally left behind comfortable lives in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. These were not desperate refugees fleeing war or persecution, but rather people seeking higher wages—an economic motive that disqualifies them from asylum in the U.S.

For years, Venezuelans and other Latin American migrants took advantage of lenient border policies under the Biden administration. They risked the treacherous Darién jungle and endured hardships to reach the U.S., hoping to find better-paying jobs. But with shifting immigration policies, many are now finding themselves unable to stay and are heading back south, often at great financial and emotional cost.

‘At Least I Made the Attempt’

John Orozco, a 49-year-old Venezuelan, spent six months in Mexico trying to secure an immigration appointment through the CBP One app—only to see it discontinued. He has now accepted that the U.S. is not an option for him.

“There was no opportunity, but I don’t regret it. I will never regret it,” he says. “The return has been even harder, and more expensive, but at least I made the attempt.”

Orozco is divorced, with one daughter in Venezuela and two children in the U.S. His return journey from Mexico has already cost him $900. He crossed into Panama through Paso Canoas at the Costa Rica border, navigating back roads to avoid immigration checkpoints.

In Mexico, he was able to work and save money, but loneliness weighed on him. Now, he plans to start over in Chile, where his sister is waiting for him in Medellín, Colombia.

“I’m not going to do anything in Venezuela,” he explains. “You can’t arrive empty-handed. You need capital to start over. Otherwise, you just end up working for a tiny wage that won’t get you anywhere.”

Reverse Migration Grows as U.S. Border Tightens

The flow of migrants heading north through the Darién jungle has collapsed by 94% compared to the same time last year, dropping from 34,839 people in January 2024 to just 2,158 in January 2025. This sharp decline follows stricter border controls by Panama and policy changes in the U.S.

Now, instead of migrants pouring into Panama on their way north, groups are attempting to enter from Costa Rica on their way south—retracing their steps in a painful and costly reversal.

Many, like Castillo and Orozco, are not simply returning to Venezuela, where economic conditions remain dire. They are looking to restart their lives in countries they once called home, places where they had jobs and stability before being tempted by the American dream.

A Dangerous Road Back

For those heading south, the journey remains perilous. Just last week, a boat carrying 21 people—mostly Venezuelans and Colombians—capsized off the Panamanian coast. While 20 survived, an 8-year-old Venezuelan girl tragically lost her life.

Despite the dangers and the hardships, the reverse migration trend underscores a stark reality: many of these migrants were never true asylum seekers. They were economic migrants who left behind stable lives in search of higher wages. Now, disillusioned and often in debt, they are making their way back—hoping to rebuild what they once had before they risked it all.

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
10
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 18, 2025
Benjamin Netanyahu Explains the Israeli Economy

Netanyahu was once Israeli Finance Minister - and it shows. He understands a lot about economics, and is worth listening to in order to get a sense for where Israel's economy is headed.

00:08:49
September 12, 2025
Video of Kirk’s Killer

BREAKING: The FBI and state of Utah have just released video of the Charlie Kirk kiIIer escaping from the scene following the shooting

He jumped off the rooftop, moved quickly through the parking lot, and then began walking casually to blend in before entering a wooded area.

He was wearing converse tennis shoes, a shirt with an eagle, and a baseball cap with a triangle.

00:00:43
September 07, 2025
Houthi Drone Strikes Israel - Two Wounded

Three Houthi drones were fired at Israel on Sunday. Two were shot down and the third struck the airport in Eilat, Wounding to his Israelis and causing the airspace to be shut down.

00:00:07
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
We’re in Panama this week

These photos are from our current tour and it’s been exactly what we hoped for. Slow pace. Real conversations. Time to breathe. From the city to the mountains to the beach, we’re exploring some of my favorite places and reconnecting over the things that matter most.

If this sounds like something you’d want to be part of next time, details are at https://www.holtonnews.com/panama-tour/

Chuck, just subcribed to Chuck Holton.com. I am a 71 yo retired airline pilot. I appreciate the fact that you have been in most, if not all the areas you report on and served in the Rangers. I am a firm believer in the concept of separation of church and state but understand (now) that many of the conflicts you report on are deeply rooted in the brain washing of the various cultures. What William F. Buckley described as a "Religeous virus"

The closet I ever came to being in the service was when I was living in Berlin (Air Berlin) 1981-1984 and they gave us military ID cards in case we were ever pressed into service to use our airplane (we only had on at the time) to haul people or supplies in or out of the Berlin Corridor. WE used to joke that "If you call information in Berlin, you'd better have some"

Anyway, I'm going to order "The death of civilization" as soon as I get done here.

Keep up the good work and thank you for your service. I know that sounds like a cliche, but really, thank...

October 07, 2025

The very sad state of the Minnesota AG... I pray this photo turns out to be made by AI.

post photo preview
post photo preview
How This War Ends—and How Israel Could Still Lose the Peace

Today’s a heavy one. It’s the anniversary of October 7, 2023—the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust—and Israel is still absorbing rockets from Gaza and drones out of Yemen even today. The war isn’t over. But the question we have to ask is: how does it end—and how does Israel avoid losing the peace even if it wins the war?

Even people on the left are starting to admit the obvious: Israel is held to a different standard. Scott Galloway—no conservative firebrand—recently pointed out that when America was attacked (Pearl Harbor, 9/11) we prosecuted war hard and nobody called it “genocide.” Israel fights more humanely than most modern campaigns—yet is told it can defend itself only up to a truce, never to victory. That’s a double standard, and it costs lives.

 

Two Years That Rewired the Region

I flew into Israel right after the attack. The scenes at Kibbutz Be’eri and elsewhere were beyond anything I’ve covered—murder and desecration. Israel’s response was righteous self-defense against an enemy that embeds in civilian neighborhoods and counts on Western outrage to do the rest.

Two realities have taken root inside Israel:

  1. Never again, for real this time. There will be a buffer between terrorists and Israeli families—permanently. Security is getting layered, redundant, and domestic; foreign goodwill is nice, but it won’t be Plan A.

  2. Humility after hubris. Israel missed it. Warnings were there; they bet the north would ignite first; they were wrong. That lesson is now baked in.

Regionally, Iran’s proxies have been smashed hard—Hamas degraded, Hezbollah leaders targeted, Iraqi militias cowed, Houthis still lobbing but bloodied. It’s reshuffled politics from Lebanon to Syria, where Iranian scaffolding has wobbled and local power centers are recalculating. Meanwhile U.S. forces have quietly absorbed hits while manning missile defenses that keep Israel breathing.

Bottom line: Israel has won a lot of battles. But on the global stage—diplomatically, informationally—Israel is bleeding support. That’s how you win the war and lose the peace.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
🔴 Live in 1 Hour — Two Years Since the October 7 Attack

Two years ago today — October 7, 2023 — Hamas launched one of the deadliest attacks on Jews since the Holocaust, murdering over 1,200 Israelis, kidnapping hundreds, and sparking a war that still burns.

In this special live report, I’ll take you back to that day — the brutality, the chaos, and the courage — and show how Israel fought back while much of the world turned its outrage against the victims.

We’ll walk through the two-year timeline of this ongoing war: from the massacre and hostage crisis, to the battle in Gaza, Hezbollah’s northern front, Red Sea attacks, and the global hypocrisy that blamed Israel for surviving.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Are We Really “Going to War” with Venezuela? What the Headlines Get Wrong

 A British tabloid blared that the U.S. is gearing up to seize ports and airfields in Venezuela. That makes for spicy clicks—but it doesn’t match the legal language, the logistics, or the real-world indicators. I’ve trained and served on teams that actually seize airfields. If that were in the works, we’d see unmistakable prep. We’re not seeing it. The bigger near-term risk? Continued strikes on drug-running assets—and a much higher likelihood of U.S.-Israeli coordination against Iran.

 

 

Trump’s Ultimatum to Hamas: Same Script, New Deadline

On Truth Social, President Trump warned Hamas to accept a peace deal by Sunday 6:00 p.m. (Washington, DC) or “all hell… will break out.” I’d love a deal, but I’m skeptical. The decision-makers in Hamas profit from perpetual war. We’ve heard “hell will break loose” before—with little U.S. follow-through beyond letting Israel keep doing what it’s been doing.

 

Greta’s “Selfie Flotilla” Wasn’t Humanitarian (Because There Was No Aid)

The IDF intercepted the flotilla that tried to enter Gazan waters handed out sandwiches, detained folks—including Greta Thunberg—and prepared deportations. The boats reportedly carried party drugs but no relief supplies. If you’ve seen real abductions from October 7th, you know the difference. This was performance activism that burned ~$500,000—money that could have fed tens of thousands for a month—on a PR stunt.

Activism that helps cameras instead of people is vanity, not virtue.

 

“Going to War” with Venezuela? Let’s Bayonet the Balloon

A tabloid headline shouted: “US military preparing to seize ports and airfields in Venezuela.” Here’s the sober cut:

  • Legal framing ≠ full war. The administration’s memo to Congress described a “non-international armed conflict” with cartels. That’s a legal term of art, not a declaration of war.

  • Seizing ports/airfields is loud. I served in the 75th Ranger Regiment (’87–’91) and jumped onto airfields. If we were truly prepping that, you’d see pre-positioned logistics, NOTAMs/NAVWARNs, air tasking changes, and a big footprint that’s hard to hide. We don’t see it.

  • Panama 1989 vs. Venezuela today. In Operation Just Cause, we invaded a country of ~2.5M with tens of thousands of troops, serious air and armor, and weeks of dedicated training. Venezuela is ~40M. Taking and holding ground there would be exponentially more complex.

What Venezuela does have

Open-source clips show Soviet-era anti-ship missiles (likely P-15 Termit/“Styx” class) moving around. They’re old, loud on radar, and easier to jam/decoy than modern systems—but in mass they can task-saturate defenses. U.S. carrier groups layer Aegis/SM-2/ESSM/CIWS and countermeasures for precisely this threat. It’s manageable—but not trivial.

The realistic playbook

  • High: More maritime interdictions of cartel “fishing boats” and smugglers off Venezuela.

  • Medium: Limited strikes on drug labs/trans-shipment sites ashore if intelligence is solid.

  • Low: A ground invasion to seize ports/airfields. That would also nuke any dreams of a Nobel and hand Moscow/Tehran a propaganda win.

 

Why This Matters Beyond Caracas

Russia, Iran, and China would love to see America bogged down in South America—anything to dilute our attention from Ukraine and the Middle East. My read: A U.S.-Israeli strike package against Iran is more likely in the near term than Marines storming Venezuelan ports. Also notable: a sizable cluster of aerial refueling assets has been spotted in the Mediterranean—fuel follows intent.

 

Mailbag Highlights (from the live Q&A)

  • “Is Venezuela as bad as Panama in ’89?” In several ways, worse—economically and institutionally.

  • “Would Brazil get involved?” Brazil’s posture is about blocking Venezuelan access to Guyana, not joining a U.S.-Venezuela fight.

  • “Could spec ops take out Maduro?” Possible in theory; risky in practice. He’s ring-fenced by Cuban and Wagner security. Risk of Russian casualties = geopolitical blowback.

  • “Cyberattacks if Europe ‘kicks off’?” Already happening daily; they’d intensify.

  • “Government shutdown hurting troops?” Politicians won’t tolerate troops missing pay; “essential services” keep running. The bigger question is what bloated government shouldn’t be doing in the first place.

 

The Rangers taught us to become extremely good at one thing: violence on command—under control. Seizing airfields meant learning everything from hot-wiring bulldozers to clearing runways to keeping a tight grip on self-discipline off-duty. That discipline still frames how I assess headlines today: verify the logistics, not the rhetoric.

 

What to Watch Next

  • Maritime interdictions off Venezuela (numbers, frequency, and targets)

  • Movement and basing of U.S. tankers/long-range strike aircraft

  • Israeli readiness indicators; U.S.-Israel joint signaling toward Iran

  • Venezuelan regime messaging and missile dispersal along the coast

If you missed the LIVE, you can watch it HERE

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals