Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Breaking Down the U.S.-Ukraine Reconstruction Fund: What’s the Deal?
February 27, 2025
post photo preview
They should have offered coffee.

Since the war in Ukraine began in 2022, the U.S. has poured billions into supporting Ukraine’s defense and economy. Now, the U.S. and Ukraine are setting up a Reconstruction Investment Fund—but what does that mean, and who really benefits? Let’s break it down.

The Basics of the Deal

Ukraine is getting wrecked by war, and rebuilding won’t be cheap. This agreement sets up a jointly managed fund where both the U.S. and Ukraine put in money to finance reconstruction projects.

  • Ukraine’s Contribution: Instead of handing over cash, Ukraine will give 50% of future profits from its natural resources—think oil, gas, minerals, and infrastructure projects (like ports).
  • U.S. Commitment: The U.S. promises long-term investment, bringing in money, financial tools, and expertise to help rebuild.
  • Joint Control: Both countries will co-manage the fund, and neither side can sell or transfer its stake without the other’s approval.
  • Blocking Russia: The deal makes sure Russia (or any of its allies) won’t benefit from Ukraine’s reconstruction.

Sounds fair, right? Maybe. But let’s dig deeper.

What Could Go Wrong?

On the surface, this looks like a win-win: Ukraine gets U.S. investment, the U.S. gets a stake in Ukraine’s future economy, and Russia gets locked out. But there are some big unknowns:

  1. Is Ukraine’s Natural Wealth Overhyped?

    • The last major resource surveys of Ukraine were done in the 1960s, under Soviet rule. That’s outdated data.
    • Some estimates claim Ukraine is sitting on trillions in untapped minerals—but if those numbers are exaggerated, Ukraine might be giving away 50% of a pie that doesn’t exist.
  2. Who Controls the Resources?

    • Many of Ukraine’s oil, gas, and mineral-rich areas are now controlled by Russia (especially in the east and Crimea).
    • If Ukraine never regains that land, what’s left for the fund to profit from?
  3. Extracting Resources is Expensive and Dangerous

    • Mining and drilling are environmentally risky, especially in war-torn areas full of landmines, bomb craters, and destroyed infrastructure.
    • If cleanup and extraction costs outweigh profits, Ukraine may not see the revenue it expects.
  4. Does Ukraine Stay in Control?

    • By giving up 50% of its resource profits, Ukraine is partially handing over control of its future economy.
    • The U.S. holds a major seat at the table, which could mean strings attached to future economic and political decisions.

So, Who Wins?

  • Short-term, Ukraine wins—it gets immediate investment and U.S. backing for rebuilding.
  • Long-term, the U.S. benefits the most—if Ukraine’s resources are valuable, the U.S. gets a stake in the profits and deepens its influence over Ukraine.
  • Russia loses—it won’t have access to post-war economic benefits and may lose long-term leverage over Ukraine.

Final Takeaway

This deal isn’t just about rebuilding—it’s about who controls Ukraine’s economic future. If Ukraine’s resources turn out to be a goldmine, it may regret giving away 50% of the profits. But if they’re overestimated, then Ukraine essentially traded away nothing for U.S. money and security guarantees—which wouldn’t be a bad deal.

The real test? Whether the resources are as valuable and accessible as advertised. If they aren’t, Ukraine might have just sold a dream.

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
4
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Israel fills Hamas tunnel with cement.

That’s one way to make sure it doesn’t get used again

00:00:17
Dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona
00:00:39
On the Shores of Issyk- Kul

Today I got a chance to check out the second largest saltwater lake in the world

00:00:49
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Shooter Identified - A Transgender INCEL.

I won't share his name, but the guy was mental. also hated jews and everyone else, apparently. And the Obama/Biden Admins let these people into the military.

Good Luck with That…

Human rights watch threatens American troops for “war crimes“ being committed by Israel, says US troops could be held personally and criminally liable for assisting Israel in any way.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/08/26/gaza-us-forces-can-be-liable-for-assisting-israeli-war-crimes

It’s time to wake up before it’s too late.
.

post photo preview
Israel’s Audacious Raid Near Damascus and What It Means for the Region

Israeli commando units, supported by helicopters and about 15 airstrikes, carried out a daring raid on a military base just five miles south of downtown Damascus. This was in a Damascus suburb, practically in the Syrian capital itself.

 Syrian soldiers stationed at a former military facility in the town of Aliswah. The strikes softened up the site and cut off nearby roads to delay reinforcements. Then Israeli commandos hit the ground for what’s called “sensitive site exploitation” — essentially gathering intelligence, dismantling surveillance devices, and recovering equipment of value.

Reports indicate those devices had been placed there by Turkey, possibly more than a decade ago, giving Ankara a window into Israel’s activities. Removing them was a clear message: Israel will not tolerate hostile eyes watching its borders.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Israel vs. the Information War

I’m convinced Israel’s greatest enemy may not be Hamas, Hezbollah, or even Iran. It’s the international press corps.

 

The Media Frontline

Every explosion, every casualty, every strike in Gaza is immediately weaponized in the media against Israel. And much of it is dishonest. The majority of people who become journalists lean left, which means they filter every story through that ideological lens.

Take the recent deaths of so-called “journalists” in Gaza. Critics like Scott Ritter claim Israel just “kills the messenger” because they don’t like what’s being reported. Ritter actually said Israel’s solution to bad press is to kill reporters.

That’s nonsense. Wearing a press vest or carrying a camera doesn’t make someone a legitimate journalist. And when someone uses that press vest as cover while aiding Hamas — whether by broadcasting IDF troop movements live, carrying an RPG, or even joining in the October 7th invasion — they’ve made themselves combatants.

I can tell you as a war correspondent: if I had filmed Taliban positions during a firefight and streamed it live, putting U.S. troops at risk, I’d have been treated as an enemy, not as a reporter. Israel operates under the same reality.

Meanwhile Hamas requires any journalist in Gaza to report from its perspective — and often forces them to delete footage or spin stories before publication. Many who wear “PRESS” vests there aren’t journalists at all; they’re Hamas operatives in disguise. That’s not freedom of the press. That’s propaganda.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Israel Hits Houthis Hard in Yemen

 Over the weekend, Israel carried out a massive series of strikes against Houthi terror targets in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa. We’re talking about 10 aircraft hitting over 50 targets—fuel depots, power stations, and even the presidential palace. The result: huge fireballs, mushroom clouds, and a message delivered in no uncertain terms—Israel has had enough.

 

Why Yemen?

A lot of people ask: why are the Houthis attacking Israel at all? Yemen is more than 1,000 kilometers away and has little direct connection. But for the Houthis, hatred of Israel is written into their identity. Literally—their slogan reads: “Death to America, Death to Israel.” They claim they’re striking in solidarity with Gaza, but make no mistake: this is about ideology, not geography.

Over the weekend, the Houthis launched what’s believed to be a ballistic missile with a cluster warhead at Israel. Thankfully, it either broke apart in flight or was intercepted. Still, this wasn’t just another provocation—cluster munitions are designed to kill people, not destroy buildings. It’s a terror weapon aimed at civilians.

Prime Minister Netanyahu made it clear in his address from the IDF command center:

“Whoever attacks us, we attack them. Whoever plans to attack us, we attack them. For every missile they launch towards Israel, the Houthis will pay with compound interest.”

That “compound interest” looks like blackouts, destroyed military compounds, and a palace in flames. Israel is proving—again—that its deterrence rests on decisive action, not empty words.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals