Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Ceasefire or Smokescreen? The Truth Behind Israel's "Truce" with Hezbollah
November 27, 2024
post photo preview

If you’ve been tuning into mainstream news, you might believe a historic ceasefire has brought peace to the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The truth, however, is far more complicated—and far less promising. What’s being heralded as a ceasefire is actually a shaky, one-sided truce, and Hezbollah isn’t even part of the deal. Let’s break down what’s really happening.

What’s Actually Happening?

At its core, this is a 60-day truce involving Israel, the United States, UNIFIL, and the Lebanese government. Notice anyone missing? That’s right—Hezbollah. Despite the fanfare, Hezbollah hasn’t agreed to stop fighting. In fact, they’ve spent the last 48 hours firing over 500 rockets, missiles, and drones into Israel, all while Israel pounds their positions across Lebanon in a pre-truce blitz.

The agreement stipulates that the Lebanese Army will move into southern Lebanon, policing the area south of the Litani River to prevent Hezbollah attacks. But here’s the catch: Hezbollah essentially is the Lebanese Army, or at least half of it. Entrusting them to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure is like asking a fox to guard the henhouse.

Israel’s Terms

Despite its limitations, the deal isn’t a total loss for Israel. Here’s what they gained:

  1. Freedom to Strike: Israel retains the right to respond to threats in Lebanon without prior U.S. approval. While they’ve agreed to alert the U.S. “whenever possible,” they can act unilaterally if needed. This flexibility allows Israel to neutralize immediate threats, such as missile launchers or incoming weapon shipments from Iran.

  2. Continued Surveillance: Israel can keep flying reconnaissance missions over Lebanon, albeit with a promise to avoid sonic booms over Beirut—an intimidation tactic they’ve frequently employed.

  3. Disruption of Iranian Supply Lines: The U.S. committed to helping Israel curb Iran’s weapon shipments into Lebanon, even suggesting American involvement in targeting smuggling routes.

On paper, this gives Israel room to breathe and regroup without sacrificing its security. But the big question remains: will Hezbollah abide by the truce?

Hezbollah’s Reality

Hezbollah is hurting—badly. Over the past few months, Israel has devastated their infrastructure:

  • 80% of Hezbollah’s rockets and missiles have been destroyed or fired.

  • Their command structure has been decimated, with thousands of operatives killed.

  • Entire villages in southern Lebanon, once Hezbollah strongholds, are now ghost towns.

Even Iran, Hezbollah’s main backer, is reportedly urging them to seek a ceasefire. The financial and military toll has been enormous, and Hezbollah’s paranoia is at an all-time high. They’ve allegedly detained—or even executed—over 200 operatives on suspicion of collaborating with Israel.

Why Did Israel Agree to a Truce?

Critics within Israel argue that this is a missed opportunity to finish the job. With Hezbollah on the ropes, some believe Israel should push harder to dismantle them completely, much like its declared goal of eradicating Hamas in Gaza. However, there are strategic reasons behind Israel’s decision:

  1. Focusing Resources: By pausing the northern conflict, Israel can concentrate on Gaza, the West Bank, and its growing standoff with Iran.

  2. Protecting Civilians: Over 60,000 Israelis displaced from their homes in the north could begin returning under the truce’s protection.

  3. International Optics: This deal provides Israel with political capital. If Hezbollah breaks the truce, it exposes their aggression, giving Israel a stronger justification to escalate again.

The U.S. Role

The Biden administration is already taking a victory lap, touting this truce as a diplomatic triumph. But let’s be clear: the U.S. isn’t a neutral player here. By brokering a deal that leans heavily on Israel’s concessions while ignoring Hezbollah’s non-participation, the U.S. appears more concerned with optics than with lasting peace.

And then there’s UNIFIL, the UN peacekeeping force tasked with monitoring southern Lebanon. Historically, UNIFIL has been criticized for its pro-Palestinian bias, raising doubts about its ability—or willingness—to ensure Hezbollah complies. Meanwhile, the U.S. continues funneling hundreds of millions of dollars to the UN despite its consistent failures in conflict zones.

What Happens Next?

This truce is a gamble. If Hezbollah abides, it could signal their desperation and allow Israel to regroup. But if they exploit the situation—using the Litani River as a shield for continued attacks—Israel will have no choice but to resume hostilities. Either way, this conflict is far from over.

For now, the people of northern Israel can hope for a reprieve. But as history has shown, hope isn’t a strategy. And in this region, peace is rarely more than an illusion.

 

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
11
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Day 2 Syria
00:01:36
Disney Land for Men in Iraq.
00:00:57
Pray for the Kurdish people in Syria

A great evil is unfolding across Syria as forces loyal to Ahmed Al Sharaa attack the Kurdish people in eastern Syria. Jihadi fighters are now unarmed and are allying themselves with ISIS once again, killing and beheading civilians in the streets. They also released thousands of ISIS fighters from prisons that were being guarded by the Kurds.

00:02:28
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

👁️‍🗨️?!📰✔️⬆️🙏⚖️✝️ROMANS1:18
PSALM127:3 1JOHN3:8
1) The Watch Floor:… Ordinary Girls Become ISIS Brides 2) Our Rescue FIELD OP:Dismantling Sex Trafficking and Rescuing Survivors:

https://ourrescue.org/operations

post photo preview

🇺🇸🙏⬆️📜🏆☕️🫶⬆️

  • BIBLE TUNES via youtube: Easy Mind song “Aramaic Lord Prayer” AND
    Matthew West - ‘Unashamed’ and ‘Don’t Stop Praying’ (Music Videos) AND ‘Dance like David danced’ on Sinai Media Ministries AND Native American Chief Joins Joshua Aaron 🎶 ‘EVERY TRIBE’ 🔴LIVE at the “TOWER of DAVID” Messianic Worship AND ‘They Call It Hate | Patriotic Christian Battle Cry - It's LOVE for Mine... Not HATE for You’ on
    Patriots United AND ‘Spiritual Warfare … Worship Song of Hope for Israel & Iran on Inspire Beats AND ‘Star Spangled Banner As You've Never Heard It” on Mona Rose

...

✔️⬆️🇺🇸🕵️‍♀️📰🏆🫶⬆️👁️‍🗨️🪖🇺🇸✔️
Anothee Testimony of TRUTHS like Chuck via The Watch Floor Sarah Adams: 2 VIDEOS: 1]ABOUT Horrers democratic leadership et such brought on Benghazi AND 2]horrors of gov of iran:

post photo preview
Erbil on the Edge: When Iran’s Regime Starts Eating Its Own

I was sitting in Erbil—northern Iraqi Kurdistan—trying to go live with Ibrahim beside me, and for a few minutes the only thing I could think about was the Starlink. The signal kept stuttering, freezing, coming back, dropping again. If you’ve ever done live reporting from the Middle East, you know how that goes. But this time it felt different, because the connection problems weren’t just “welcome to the region.” It sounded like Iran’s shutdown was starting to ripple outward—like the whole neighborhood was feeling the strain.

And that’s the mood here right now: strain. Everybody senses we’re close to the edge of something.

The conversation we keep circling back to is Iran—what’s likely to happen tonight or tomorrow night, and what the regime is doing to its own people in the meantime. The numbers coming out of Iran are hard to verify, but they’re also too consistent across too many channels to shrug off. I’m hearing claims that the regime has killed tens of thousands—some reports pushing as high as 80,000 dead. Two weeks ago the number being floated was 20,000. Now people are saying it has multiplied. I can’t independently corroborate that figure, and neither can anyone else right now, because the regime has every reason to hide the truth and the internet inside Iran is being choked down. But even if those reports are exaggerated, the direction of the story is unmistakable: the regime is using mass violence to keep control, and it’s doing it at a pace that suggests fear inside the leadership.

When a government starts killing like that, it’s not because it feels secure. It’s because it doesn’t.

At the same time, you’ve got this other thing happening—something you can measure without rumors or emotion. You can look at maps, ship movements, aircraft staging, and refueling capacity and see a pattern that doesn’t show up unless a real operation is being built.

The U.S. posture around Iran right now is massive. People throw that word around, but I mean it literally: we’re talking about nearly 500 aircraft in a full-spectrum posture, nonstop surveillance on Iranian airspace and defenses, and the kind of tanker support that exists for one reason—so jets can stay on station, keep flying sorties, and keep coming back. The fuel offload capacity number being discussed is over five million pounds. That’s the kind of logistical “tell” that matters more than speeches, because fuel and tankers are what make sustained air campaigns possible.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Live From Erbil: When the Satellites Blink and the Region Holds Its Breath

There are places in the world where the air feels different—not because of altitude or humidity, but because history is leaning forward, listening for the next sound, and everybody can feel it in their bones.

Tonight, I’m coming to you from Erbil, up here in northern Iraqi Kurdistan, not far from the Iranian border, and I’m sitting alongside one of my favorite people on planet Earth, my friend Ibrahim—one of the greatest Kurds you’ll ever meet, the kind of guy who has seen enough betrayal to make most men bitter, and yet somehow still has the courage to look you in the eye and talk about hope like it’s a real thing.

We were fighting the Starlink connection when we went live, and if the signal froze, if the audio hiccuped, if the feed stuttered and jumped, it wasn’t because we were being dramatic—it’s because the internet across this region is in bad shape right now, and I suspect it’s connected to what’s happening next door in Iran, where the regime has been trying to silence the country by shutting down the digital oxygen that keeps people connected to the outside world, because tyrants always do the same thing when they start losing control: they cut the wires, they darken the streets, and they hope the world will look away.

But the world isn’t looking away, not tonight.

And neither are we.

 

The Rumors Out of Iran Are Horrifying—and the Regime Is Acting Like a Dying Animal

The word coming out of Iran right now is brutal, and I’m going to be careful here because some of the numbers are hard to corroborate in real time, especially when the regime is jamming communications and the fog of fear is thick, but what we are hearing—what people are whispering, what sources are repeating, what the Iranian people themselves are trying to scream through the cracks—is that the regime has been massacring civilians in staggering numbers, to the point where some claims are approaching tens of thousands and even more, and whether those figures are precise or inflated in the chaos, the direction of the story is unmistakable: the killing is accelerating, not slowing down.

And it feels, from the outside looking in, like the Islamic Republic has reached that stage where it’s no longer trying to govern—it’s trying to survive, and it’s doing it the only way it knows how, by lashing out, by killing its way out of the problem, like a cornered animal that can’t imagine surrender because surrender would mean accountability, and accountability would mean the end.

That’s the atmosphere right now.

That’s the temperature of this moment.

And into that moment, President Trump has made statements—big statements—about help being on the way, statements he has reiterated, and meanwhile the people of Iran are begging him to intervene, not because they suddenly trust America or love the West, but because they have reached that level of desperation where they’ll grab onto any lifeline, even one that might cut their hands.

But here’s the thing: for all the talk, it has looked like the United States was not prepared to strike when those words were first spoken.

That gap—between “help is on the way” and the reality of “nothing has happened yet”—is where hope turns into rage, and where people start dying in the dark while the world debates.

 

This Is Not Political Posturing: Look at the Fuel

Now, I want you to understand something, because there’s a lot of noise online and it’s easy to get cynical and say, “Oh, this is just chest-thumping,” or “This is just another round of saber-rattling,” or “This is a bluff.”

But when you’re looking at military posture, one of the biggest telltale signs isn’t the speeches, and it isn’t even the ships—it’s fuel.

Right now, the United States has amassed more than 5.37 million pounds of fuel offload capacity in the region, and that should make your eyebrows go up, because you don’t stage that kind of refueling capability unless you’re preparing for sustained operations, the kind of operations where aircraft aren’t just launching once, dropping a payload, and going home, but where they are cycling, returning, refueling, and going right back in again until the mission is complete.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
I Went to Greenland. The Truth About Trump's Claim

I stepped off the plane into Nuuk expecting “cold,” the way you expect cold when you’ve looked at a weather app and seen a number with a minus sign attached, but Greenland doesn’t really do cold as a temperature so much as it does cold as a condition—something that presses against your cheeks, creeps into your gloves, and makes the simplest choices feel like strategy, like whether you can afford to stop walking long enough to film a shot without your hands turning into useless bricks.

The first thing that hits you is how close everything feels to the edge of the world: the ocean is right there, the mountains loom like the backdrop of a survival documentary, and the snow doesn’t just “fall,” it moves sideways, drifting and pooling into ridges that force you off sidewalks and into the kind of half-plowed, half-forgotten paths where you start making peace with the idea that you might have to cut between somebody’s house just to find your way back to wherever “home” is tonight.

I walked down to the water because I wanted to see what Nuuk looks like the way Nuuk sees itself—facing outward, facing the sea—and out there, unbelievably, there was a guy in a boat, just working the icy water like it was any other day, which is the kind of detail that makes you realize how quickly humans can normalize the extraordinary when the extraordinary is what they grew up with.

And then there were the icebergs.

Not the dramatic, movie-poster ones you think of when someone says “iceberg,” but these smaller pieces that look like they broke off something much bigger and drifted in close, like the Arctic casually scattering fragments of itself along the shore for you to study up close; some of them were the size of a truck, which still qualifies as “tiny” here, and some were smaller still, but the color is what keeps pulling your eyes back—this improbable, almost luminous blue that looks like it belongs in a gemstone, not in a chunk of frozen seawater sitting on a beach.

It was around sixteen degrees when I filmed that first clip—sixteen Fahrenheit—and people kept telling me, almost cheerfully, that I was lucky, because this was “pretty warm,” and that’s the kind of local optimism you either admire or resent depending on how far into your gloves the cold has crawled.

But I didn’t come to Greenland just to confirm that it is, in fact, Greenland.

I came because I wanted to see what it feels like in a place when the President of the United States starts talking about that place the way a developer talks about an empty lot, or the way a bully talks about a smaller kid’s lunch money, and I wanted to hear it from the people who live here—people who have never had to wonder whether America is a friend, because the assumption has always been yes, of course, that’s what allies are.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals