Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Make Him a Man: America Depends on It
November 13, 2024

Hey, you’re a parent. It’s a free country, and they’re your kids—you can raise them however you want. But remember, the rest of us are going to be living in the world with them too. And frankly, we’re frustrated with what we see: weak, overly sheltered boys who have been taught to avoid discomfort and to eschew risk at all costs. They’re careful, quiet, and spend most of their lives watching screens instead of facing the world head-on. They’ve become like pampered little poodles, sitting comfortably on the couch, always taking the path of least resistance.

But here’s the problem: these boys will grow up. One day, they’ll be expected to step into roles as providers, protectors, and leaders. Unfortunately, while they’ve spent their youth on easy streets, coddled and swaddled in air-conditioned comfort, there are other young men out there living a very different reality. Boys in tough corners of the world sleep in the dirt, go without food, do back-breaking labor, and carry responsibilities far beyond their years. For them, hardship isn’t something to be avoided; it’s simply life.

And make no mistake: these young men have been taught to despise us. They see our culture as soft, self-indulgent, and unprincipled. And they’re not wrong.

While we’re busy raising sons who’ve never even heard a hard “no” in their lives, these other boys—young men from Syria, Afghanistan, North Africa—are taught to be strong, relentless, and unyielding. They’re being prepared for a fight we’ve barely begun to notice. I’ve seen them. They don’t dream of coming to America to join us; they plan to conquer what they view as a decaying, soft society. And if we’re not vigilant, they’ll do it without resistance.

Like it or not, our sons may one day have to square off against those hardened young men who grew up knowing only struggle. And when that day comes, will your comfortable, sheltered son be ready? Can he protect himself and the people he loves? Or have you inadvertently raised him to be just another liability?

Not every boy will be a warrior, but some must be. And if you think we can keep the peace indefinitely without raising men capable of standing up for what they believe in, think again. This isn’t just about self-defense; it’s about producing strong men who can preserve our way of life. Because those of us who have been on the frontlines? We’re not getting any younger, and the burden of protection won’t rest on our shoulders forever.

America needs more young men who are tough, capable, and morally straight. But take a hard look around: is your son that man? Or is he too distracted with his virtual worlds to even consider the real one? Are you unintentionally raising him to be irrelevant—or worse, a weak spot in America’s armor?

My son Mason, age 9

 

Boys aren’t meant to stay soft. They’re meant to grow into strong men, able to protect, provide, and fiercely love the people who depend on them. Sure, not all of them will end up on the battlefield, but life itself can be a battleground. Whether he’s facing an enemy, supporting his family, or simply holding firm in the face of hardship, your son will need the resilience to take on whatever life throws at him. And resilience isn’t something you get from a comfortable, cushy upbringing.

Raising a boy to be a man means setting him up to embrace discomfort, to learn from struggle, to build character. If you’re doing everything in your power to keep him happy, entertained, and out of danger, let’s face it—you’re part of the problem.

Instead, give your son controlled doses of hardship every day. Let him feel fear, and then teach him to overcome it. Give him responsibility from the moment he can handle it. Discipline him with purpose, set high expectations, and don’t give in when he pushes back. He’s not in charge—you are. And it’s your duty to prepare him to lead one day.

America needs strong men—so raise one. The country, and our way of life, depend on it.

 

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
10
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
On the Shores of Issyk- Kul

Today I got a chance to check out the second largest saltwater lake in the world

00:00:49
Is the U.S. Training Syria’s New Jihadist Army?

Very few media outlets are talking about this, but they should be — urgently.

While most of the world is distracted, U.S. troops are conducting live training exercises in Syria with the forces of the country’s new interim government, now led by Ahmed al-Sharaa — a man widely known as a former Al Qaeda affiliate.

Let that sink in.

Recent reports confirm that U.S. personnel at the Al-Tanf garrison have been training members of the so-called 70th Division, a unit formed from remnants of the Syrian Free Army, which now pledges loyalty to this new government. This comes right on the heels of a massacre of Druze civilians, allegedly carried out by those very same government-aligned forces.

Aiding the Next Generation of Jihadists?
This isn’t just a questionable policy — it could be morally catastrophic.

Druze communities, who have long sought neutrality in Syria’s civil war, were brutally attacked.

Christian populations in the region are living in fear, as radical factions become emboldened ...

00:06:03
Debunked

Debunked: Following several accusations that Israel is causing famine in Gaza, COGAT has released drone footage of the hundreds of truckloads of supplies waiting to be delivered to Gaza by the UN. A statement accompanying the footage claims that 'There is enough food here to feed all of Gaza, if the UN ever came to pick it up.

00:00:39
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
CCCP memorabilia, horse sausage pizza

And a meat market

More beautiful places in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

In all the growing chaos and uncertainty, I find great comfort in this awesome reality.

"For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 8:38-39)

We cannot be separated from God's love because we haven't received it by our own merit. For God hates sin but loves righteousness. Through faith in Jesus we have received the gift of righteousness:

"For if by one man's offense death reigned by one, much more they who receive abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by One, Jesus Christ." (Romans 5:17)

In our spirits we've been born anew into the likeness of Jesus (John 3:6, Colossians 3:10), into His righteousness and holiness (Ephesians 4:24). Because of this, God can love us freely and perfectly- for we've been redeemed eternally from all our sin ...

post photo preview
Tripwire Troops: An Underused Strategy to Stop Wars Before They Start

From my vantage point in northern Kyrgyzstan, reflecting on global conflicts, one question looms large: is there a middle path between full-scale war and appeasement? Former President Donald Trump’s stated goal to “stop the killing” in Ukraine and Israel is laudable, but the method matters. Stopping the violence at the cost of surrender whether by forcing Ukraine to cede territory to Russia or by demanding Israel stand down to Hamas would be neither just nor lasting.

History offers a third way: deterrence through presence. This is the concept behind tripwire troops small, forward-deployed U.S. military units positioned in strategic locations not to fight, but to make any act of aggression against them an act of war against the United States. The result? Adversaries think twice.

Why Forward Presence Works

The U.S. currently has forces deployed in more than 170 countries, totaling around 170,000 service members. While many of these deployments are embassy security or routine training, a fraction are “tripwire” positions. These troops’ primary mission is deterrence, not combat.

The logic is simple: an attack that kills Americans compels a U.S. military response, something most adversaries cannot afford to provoke. In the Baltics, Poland, and other NATO states, these forces serve as a visible barrier to Russian expansion. The concept works in other regions as well:

  • South Korea: 28,500 U.S. troops have deterred North Korean aggression for over 70 years.

  • Kosovo: U.S. and allied forces have prevented a resumption of war between Serbia and Kosovo for decades.

  • Middle East: U.S. presence in Syria, Iraq, and Jordan has restrained—not eliminated hostile actions by regional actors.

In many cases, host nations share the costs. Germany, Japan, and South Korea contribute billions annually to offset expenses, making forward deployment more cost-effective than often assumed.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Global Divestment Pressure: Can Israel Withstand the Economic and Political Storm?

From the mountains of southern Kazakhstan, I’ve been following a significant development in the ongoing war involving Israel, the accelerating momentum of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. This decades-old campaign, aimed at isolating Israel economically and politically, has gained renewed traction since the outbreak of the current conflict.

BDS and Its New Momentum

The BDS movement, short for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions, seeks to pressure Israel into policy concessions by targeting its economy. While such campaigns are not new, the latest wave of support for BDS has been spurred by allegations of famine in Gaza.

Recent reports from the United Nations claim that malnutrition rates in Gaza have “risen dramatically” over the past month. However, those figures have been challenged, with evidence suggesting that the UN altered its metrics reducing the malnutrition threshold from 30% to 15% thereby inflating the reported crisis. Critics argue that such statistical manipulation mirrors past political tactics used to reshape narratives on unemployment, inflation, and debt.

Israel, meanwhile, continues to allow significant humanitarian aid into Gaza, including roughly 200 truckloads of supplies daily, more than enough, according to analysts, to feed the population multiple times a day.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
U.S. Pledges Peace Talks, But Will Putin Play Hardball at the Alaska Summit?

I’m writing to you tonight from the mountains of Kazakhstan, where I’ve been closely following the announcement of an upcoming meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The summit is expected to take place in Alaska, a choice that’s already stirred more than a little controversy.

During a recent press conference, President Trump misspoke twice, saying he would be going “to Russia” rather than Alaska. That slip didn’t go unnoticed in Moscow, where nationalists still talk about Alaska as if it were theirs for the taking. In fact, I’ve seen images of a patch making the rounds among Russian military units that shows Russia and Alaska side by side, with the slogan “We’ll take it all.” Needless to say, the symbolism here is troubling.

Why Ukraine Is Really at Stake
This meeting is about more than just a photo op in Alaska it’s about Ukraine. For over three years, Russia has been waging a brutal war of aggression, making only modest territorial gains while losing staggering numbers of troops and equipment. Despite that, they’re now ramping up attacks, likely to grab as much land as possible before any potential negotiations.

From my vantage point, it’s obvious that Putin’s idea of “peace talks” is simple: keep whatever he’s already taken, and take more if he can before the talking starts. That’s not compromise, that's conquest.

Trump’s Framing of the Talks
President Trump says he’ll go into this meeting to “see what they want to meet about,” and afterward, he’ll speak with President Zelensky and European leaders. He’s also made it clear he wants a “fair deal for both parties.” My question is why should Russia, the aggressor, get a fair shake at the expense of the country they invaded?

Ukraine’s constitution requires a public referendum before giving up any territory. That safeguard exists to prevent exactly the kind of forced surrender Putin is hoping for. Yet Trump has criticized Zelensky for this, as if it’s somehow unreasonable that the Ukrainian president can’t just hand over land.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals