Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Make Him a Man: America Depends on It
November 13, 2024

Hey, you’re a parent. It’s a free country, and they’re your kids—you can raise them however you want. But remember, the rest of us are going to be living in the world with them too. And frankly, we’re frustrated with what we see: weak, overly sheltered boys who have been taught to avoid discomfort and to eschew risk at all costs. They’re careful, quiet, and spend most of their lives watching screens instead of facing the world head-on. They’ve become like pampered little poodles, sitting comfortably on the couch, always taking the path of least resistance.

But here’s the problem: these boys will grow up. One day, they’ll be expected to step into roles as providers, protectors, and leaders. Unfortunately, while they’ve spent their youth on easy streets, coddled and swaddled in air-conditioned comfort, there are other young men out there living a very different reality. Boys in tough corners of the world sleep in the dirt, go without food, do back-breaking labor, and carry responsibilities far beyond their years. For them, hardship isn’t something to be avoided; it’s simply life.

And make no mistake: these young men have been taught to despise us. They see our culture as soft, self-indulgent, and unprincipled. And they’re not wrong.

While we’re busy raising sons who’ve never even heard a hard “no” in their lives, these other boys—young men from Syria, Afghanistan, North Africa—are taught to be strong, relentless, and unyielding. They’re being prepared for a fight we’ve barely begun to notice. I’ve seen them. They don’t dream of coming to America to join us; they plan to conquer what they view as a decaying, soft society. And if we’re not vigilant, they’ll do it without resistance.

Like it or not, our sons may one day have to square off against those hardened young men who grew up knowing only struggle. And when that day comes, will your comfortable, sheltered son be ready? Can he protect himself and the people he loves? Or have you inadvertently raised him to be just another liability?

Not every boy will be a warrior, but some must be. And if you think we can keep the peace indefinitely without raising men capable of standing up for what they believe in, think again. This isn’t just about self-defense; it’s about producing strong men who can preserve our way of life. Because those of us who have been on the frontlines? We’re not getting any younger, and the burden of protection won’t rest on our shoulders forever.

America needs more young men who are tough, capable, and morally straight. But take a hard look around: is your son that man? Or is he too distracted with his virtual worlds to even consider the real one? Are you unintentionally raising him to be irrelevant—or worse, a weak spot in America’s armor?

My son Mason, age 9

 

Boys aren’t meant to stay soft. They’re meant to grow into strong men, able to protect, provide, and fiercely love the people who depend on them. Sure, not all of them will end up on the battlefield, but life itself can be a battleground. Whether he’s facing an enemy, supporting his family, or simply holding firm in the face of hardship, your son will need the resilience to take on whatever life throws at him. And resilience isn’t something you get from a comfortable, cushy upbringing.

Raising a boy to be a man means setting him up to embrace discomfort, to learn from struggle, to build character. If you’re doing everything in your power to keep him happy, entertained, and out of danger, let’s face it—you’re part of the problem.

Instead, give your son controlled doses of hardship every day. Let him feel fear, and then teach him to overcome it. Give him responsibility from the moment he can handle it. Discipline him with purpose, set high expectations, and don’t give in when he pushes back. He’s not in charge—you are. And it’s your duty to prepare him to lead one day.

America needs strong men—so raise one. The country, and our way of life, depend on it.

 

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
10
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Update From Croatia

From yesterday*

I appreciate all of you supporting the hot zone. Thank you for being here.

How do you think this is all going to end?

00:03:39
Ukraine Safeguarding its Troops with Technology

If you have wondered why Russia is losing so many men and Ukraine is not, this will help explain it. Russia is sending men into the front lines where they are killed by drone operators from Ukraine who are hundreds of miles away from the front lines.

00:02:17
Live Call Recording: April 25, 2026

Thank you all for joining us this month on our Live call. I love getting to see your faces and have real conversations with you all.

What was your favorite moment or topic from this call?

01:25:31
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

HEY CHUCK, THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR SERVICE PAST AND FUTURE. I AM SORRY THERE HAS TO BE FOOLS TO MAKE HURTFUL STATEMENTS, BUT I THANK GOD FOR THE FREEDOM OF SPEACH, I JUST WISH THEY WOULD LEARN SOME COMMON SENSE..KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK...WM

If you could choose my next overseas reporting trip, which would you pick?

I’d love to hear why you picked your choice in the comments. Your feedback really does help me decide where to go next.

⛓️‍💥👏🎊🙏⬆️🏆🇺🇸📜”GOP Senator Just FOUND A WAY to OVERTURN The Supreme Court on Birthright Citizenship! 113K views · 1 day ago...more” George A.A. YouTube

post photo preview
Iran Isn't Negotiating. It's Buying Time.

 

For months, the White House has maintained that diplomacy remains the best path to preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Public statements have consistently portrayed negotiations as productive, suggesting that Tehran is engaged in meaningful discussions that could reduce tensions across the Middle East.

Recent developments tell a different story.

Despite repeated claims that diplomatic channels remain open, Iranian officials continue to refuse direct negotiations over the issues Washington considers non-negotiable. Instead of discussing limits on uranium enrichment or nuclear inspections, Tehran has focused almost exclusively on recovering billions of dollars in frozen assets while maintaining its strategic leverage in the Strait of Hormuz.

The growing disconnect between public optimism and the reality of the negotiations raises an uncomfortable question: Are these talks moving toward a genuine agreement, or are they simply buying time for both sides?

Conflicting Narratives

The latest diplomatic effort has been marked by contradictory public statements.

American officials continue to insist that discussions are ongoing, describing technical meetings and indirect contacts as evidence of progress. Iranian leaders, however, have repeatedly denied that meaningful negotiations with the United States are taking place. According to officials in Tehran, the only subject worth discussing is the release of Iranian financial assets frozen under international sanctions. Nuclear concessions, they insist, are not part of the conversation.

That difference is more than a matter of political messaging. It reflects two governments pursuing entirely different objectives.

Washington continues seeking an agreement that would limit Iran's nuclear capabilities and reduce regional instability. Tehran appears focused on securing economic relief without making concessions that would weaken its military or strategic position.

When both sides define success differently, the prospects for a lasting agreement become increasingly uncertain.

The Strait of Hormuz Remains Iran's Greatest Source of Leverage

Iran's negotiating position is strengthened by geography.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world's most important maritime chokepoints, carrying a significant share of global oil exports each day. Even the threat of disruption can drive higher shipping costs, increase insurance rates, and inject uncertainty into global energy markets.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Middle East Isn't Calming Down. It's Rearranging for the Next Fight.

For a few days, it looked like the crisis with Iran might finally be cooling off. Markets steadied, diplomats returned to the negotiating table, and Washington projected confidence that a new round of talks could prevent a wider regional war. The headlines suggested the worst might be behind us.

That optimism didn't last long.

Iran resumed attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, once again targeting one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints. The United States answered with another round of airstrikes against Iranian military targets, and Tehran responded in kind. Within hours, it became clear that what many were calling a ceasefire was never much more than a temporary pause in the fighting.

The reality is that this conflict never truly stopped. It simply shifted into a new phase.

The Strait of Hormuz Remains the Center of the Conflict

Iran's strategy hasn't changed. Rather than confronting the United States directly, Tehran continues to use the Strait of Hormuz as its primary source of leverage. Nearly 20 percent of the world's oil supply passes through this narrow stretch of water, making it one of the most strategically important shipping lanes on Earth. Even limited disruptions can send shockwaves through global energy markets.

The latest attack on the cargo vessel Ever Lovely demonstrated that Iran remains willing to threaten commercial shipping despite ongoing negotiations. In response, American forces struck missile launchers, drone facilities, naval assets, and infrastructure belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Those strikes were significant, but they were also carefully calibrated. Washington continues to describe its actions as "proportional responses," designed to deter further attacks without triggering a broader regional war. Whether that approach actually changes Iran's behavior is becoming an increasingly important question.

Diplomacy Faces a Serious Challenge

President Trump has repeatedly expressed confidence that Iran wants a negotiated settlement. Iranian officials, however, continue sending a very different message.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Ceasefire Is Over. Now the Real Question Is Whether Anyone Wants to End This War.

Just days after Washington announced what was supposed to be the first step toward de-escalation with Iran, the fighting has resumed.

Iran struck the Singapore-flagged cargo vessel MV Ever Lovely in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly using a one-way attack drone that punched a massive hole through the ship's hull. The United States responded with airstrikes against Iranian missile launch sites, drone storage facilities, radar installations, and command centers along Iran's southern coast.

Predictably, Tehran declared that it had retaliated against American forces in the region, although independent confirmation of those claims has yet to emerge.

For anyone hoping the recent diplomatic breakthrough had ended the crisis, this latest exchange should erase those expectations.

The ceasefire, such as it was, never had much chance of surviving.

It Was Never Really a Ceasefire

One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding the recent agreement is the belief that Iran signed a formal ceasefire.

It didn't.

What was signed was a memorandum of understanding—a preliminary framework expressing a willingness to continue negotiations. It was not a binding peace agreement, nor did it permanently settle the issues that brought both countries to the brink of war.

Almost immediately after the memorandum was announced, Iran attempted to expand its scope by demanding that the United States restrain Israel's military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Israel was never a party to the agreement.

And while diplomats debated language, Hezbollah continued launching rockets and drones into northern Israel, prompting additional Israeli retaliation.

From the beginning, the diplomatic framework rested on assumptions that simply did not exist on the battlefield.

The Strait of Hormuz Remains the Center of Gravity

The attack on the Ever Lovely was not random.

It reflects Iran's long-standing effort to assert greater control over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important maritime chokepoints.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals