Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
The Iran War Has Come Home
Terror attacks on American soil, new Iranian proxy activity in Europe, and a widening battlefield are changing the shape of this conflict
March 13, 2026

This conflict has already moved beyond the region where it began. It is no longer just a story about missile launches over Israel, strikes on Iranian military infrastructure, or tension in the Strait of Hormuz. It has now reached into Europe, and it has reached into the United States. In other words, the war has come home.

Over the last twenty-four hours alone, we saw two terror attacks inside the United States, both tied to jihadi lone-wolf actors. Investigators are still sorting out whether those incidents were coordinated in any meaningful operational sense, and my own suspicion is that they probably were not, but they occurred close enough together in time to create understandable concern. The larger point is not whether those two attacks were centrally directed from some bunker halfway around the world. The larger point is that the ideological fire has already spread, and we should expect more sparks before this is over.

One of those attacks took place at Old Dominion University, where a man entered an ROTC class, confirmed that it was indeed the ROTC class, and then opened fire on the instructor, Lieutenant Colonel Brandon Shaw. I do not name mass shooters, because I refuse to give evil free publicity, but I will absolutely name the victims, because they are the ones whose memory deserves honor. Lieutenant Colonel Shaw was a combat veteran who had served with the 82nd Airborne, and he was murdered in that classroom.

What happened next says a great deal about the kind of courage America desperately needs to recover. Rather than scatter, hide, and pray the violence would pass them by, the students in that room converged on the shooter. They tackled him, subdued him, and, in the words of the police chief, rendered him “no longer alive.” Additional reporting later indicated that one of the students had a pocketknife and used it repeatedly until the threat was over. It was brutal, and it was tragic, but it was also the kind of response that actually stops evil instead of cowering in the face of it.

I have said for years that I do not like the way we train people to respond to mass casualty events. We tell them to “run, hide, fight,” as though fighting were some regrettable last resort rather than the morally necessary thing to do when someone is murdering innocent people in front of you. My view is very simple: if a shooter is in a room full of people and he is the only one with a weapon, then every able-bodied man in that room should turn and converge on him. Yes, some people may get hurt in the process. That is awful, but if we make a habit of meeting evil with decisive force, we will eventually see less of it.

I remember once being on a military installation during the Obama years and seeing a poster instructing soldiers that in the event of a mass shooting they should run away, hide, and only fight as a last resort. Underneath all of that was the phrase, “Don’t be a hero.” I remember standing there thinking that if there is one place on earth where we ought to be cultivating heroism, it is on an American military base. The idea that we would tell our soldiers not to be heroes is the kind of moral confusion that only a very soft and very unserious culture could produce. At Old Dominion, those students rejected that message instinctively, and I thank God they did. May the memory of Lieutenant Colonel Brandon Shaw be a blessing.

The second attack took place at what was described as the nation’s largest synagogue, located in Detroit. An assailant rammed his vehicle into the entrance and opened fire through the windows at security personnel. In that case, the outcome was different for one very important reason: the synagogue had prepared. Security had recently conducted active-shooter training, they were already on high alert, and they were equipped to respond. The guards neutralized the threat before the attacker managed to kill anyone inside. That is not luck. That is what preparation looks like, and it is the kind of sober realism more institutions in the West are going to need in the months and years ahead.

According to the information I cited in the live, both of these attackers were American citizens, but both had been radicalized. In the case of the Old Dominion shooter, I noted that he had previously been arrested in 2013 for material support to ISIS, imprisoned, and then released in 2024. Whatever the final public record says about every detail in that case, the broader pattern is not hard to see. The threat is not theoretical, and it is not entirely external. Radicalization is already present inside our own borders, and wartime conditions only make that more dangerous.

Nor were these the only incidents worth noting. There was a thwarted synagogue attack in Norway, additional attacks in Israel including a stabbing and an attempted vehicle ramming, and the grim reality that in Israel these kinds of attacks have become so common they barely make international news anymore. That fact alone ought to tell us something. One side in this broader conflict has normalized violence against civilians to such a degree that the outside world has become numb to it. When attacks pile up in this many countries within such a short period of time, and when the same ideological slogans accompany them over and over again, it becomes absurd to pretend we do not recognize the common denominator.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
8
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Rubio rocks!

Marco Rubio goes full Ayn Rand and it is glorious.

00:02:57
Update From Croatia

From yesterday*

I appreciate all of you supporting the hot zone. Thank you for being here.

How do you think this is all going to end?

00:03:39
Ukraine Safeguarding its Troops with Technology

If you have wondered why Russia is losing so many men and Ukraine is not, this will help explain it. Russia is sending men into the front lines where they are killed by drone operators from Ukraine who are hundreds of miles away from the front lines.

00:02:17
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
America Isn't Ready for the Next Crisis | Chuck Holton on Faith, Community & Preparedness

In this interview with CBN News, former Army Ranger and war correspondent Chuck Holton argues that America's greatest crisis isn't a future apocalypse—it's the quiet breakdown already happening in communities today. Drawing from his book RED Teams, Holton says the real signs of collapse are loneliness, fractured families, neglected widows and the elderly, and churches that have become spectators instead of community leaders.

https://cbn.com/news/us/faith-preparedness-and-survival-former-army-rangers-message-america

There are different aspects of salvation. For instance, in Acts 2:40, Peter exhorts the people to be saved from their wicked generation. Seven verses later, it is written that believers were being saved day by day (Acts 2:47). Because the word "saved" here is in the present tense—following Peter's previous exhortation—this aspect of salvation is directly related to being saved from the evil influence of that wicked generation. It is crucial when dealing with words like "salvation" or "perishing" that we carefully interpret their meaning according to the context of the passage and in light of other clear biblical teachings, instead of just jumping to the conclusion that such words are always a heaven-or-hell issue.

So much of what is called Christianity is neither biblical nor derived from God (Matthew 7:21-23, Galatians 1:6-9). My wife and I have come out of different churches and denominations over the years, and we have learned how the traditions of man—and ultimately Satan—are pervasive in many places, not just within hyper-charismatic circles (Mark 7:8, 2 Corinthians 11:13-15). Complacency is a rampant disease among many of the saints (Amos 6:1, Revelation 3:15-16). Often, leaders and believers are satisfied with the status quo of their belief system, and they will do anything to protect it—even ignore clear scriptural revelation that contradicts their theology (Jeremiah 5:30-31, 2 Timothy 4:3-4). Too many people have no interest in learning God's Word and growing, unless it validates their cherished beliefs and practices (Isaiah 30:9-10, John 3:19-20).

If this hurts and burdens my heart, it must hurt God's immensely (Ephesians 4:30). He bought us with the precious blood of Jesus—not to...

post photo preview
The Threat Against Trump Is Worse Than We Knew
An Iranian plot, a dramatic Air Force One deception, and America’s dangerous race to catch up on drone defense

The threat environment around President Donald Trump has reached a level I have never seen before—and new reporting about what happened during his trip to Turkey shows just how serious it has become.

When Trump left Ankara after meeting with NATO leaders on July 8, the public was initially told that he had used an older Air Force One for nostalgic reasons. Then we heard that the newer aircraft was unavailable. After that, reports suggested that security concerns had influenced the decision.

Now we are learning that the situation was much more dramatic.

According to new reporting, American and Israeli intelligence had picked up a credible Iranian threat against the president’s aircraft. The danger was considered serious enough that the Secret Service and the military carried out the kind of deception you would expect to see in a Hollywood thriller.

Trump boarded the older Air Force One with members of the press pool and his staff. Everyone aboard was reportedly instructed to close the window shades. A catering truck then pulled alongside the aircraft as though it were delivering food.

Instead, the president got into the truck.

The vehicle carried him across the tarmac to a smaller, less conspicuous government aircraft—a C-32A—which then flew him out of Ankara. Many of the people traveling with him apparently did not know what was happening until later.

Think about that for a moment. The president of the United States had to slip off Air Force One in a catering vehicle and leave a NATO summit aboard a smaller decoy aircraft because the Iranian threat was considered credible enough that officials feared his plane could be attacked.

That tells us at least two things. First, Iran’s threats against President Trump cannot be dismissed as empty propaganda. Second, the United States cannot afford to assume that every NATO ally can provide a secure operating environment simply because its flag appears on the right list in Washington.

Israel reportedly helped identify the threat. If that intelligence contributed to getting the president home alive, Americans ought to remember it.

Why Are Missile Batteries Guarding a Golf Course?

The extraordinary precautions did not end in Turkey.

Recent images from Trump’s golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, show Avenger short-range air-defense systems positioned nearby and surrounded by concertina wire. These Humvee-mounted systems carry Stinger missiles and a .50-caliber machine gun.

That is not normal golf-course scenery.

The Avenger is designed to protect troops and critical assets from low-flying aircraft, helicopters, and other aerial threats. If officials are deploying that kind of equipment while the president plays golf, they are not worried only about a hobbyist accidentally flying a DJI drone into restricted airspace.

They are preparing for the possibility of a deliberate attack.

The obvious threat is a small commercial or homemade drone modified to carry explosives. These aircraft can fly low, move quickly, and approach from directions that make them difficult to detect. They are also cheap. That creates an ugly economic problem: firing a Stinger missile costing hundreds of thousands of dollars at a drone worth a few hundred or a few thousand dollars is wildly inefficient.

But if that drone is headed toward the president, nobody is going to worry about the price of the missile.

The harder problem is engagement range. A small drone can be difficult to detect and hit before it gets close enough for an explosion—or even falling debris—to injure the person being protected. A manually aimed machine gun is not an ideal answer to a dinner-plate-sized target moving at highway speed. Missiles also have practical limitations at very short distances.

That is why presidential protection now requires a layered counter-drone system: radar and other sensors to detect the aircraft, electronic systems to disrupt or seize control of it, directed-energy weapons to damage its electronics, and kinetic weapons as the final line of defense.

After the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania—where the attacker had reportedly flown a drone over the venue before climbing onto a roof—the Secret Service accelerated its counter-drone efforts. That was necessary, but it also revealed how far behind the United States had allowed itself to fall.

The Drone War Is Already Here

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
When Charity Becomes Self-Destructive: Spain’s Border Crisis Is a Warning to the West When Charity Becomes Self-Destructive: Spain’s Border Crisis Is a Warning to the West

A large and sudden influx of migrants into Spain’s North African enclave of Ceuta has created a situation that should be understood as a broader warning to Western nations that attempt to separate compassion from enforcement, borders, and consequences. Ceuta, a Spanish territory located on the northern coast of Africa and directly adjacent to Morocco, has historically maintained a population of roughly 80,000 people, yet local authorities now report that tens of thousands of migrants have arrived in an extremely short period, with some estimates suggesting the number may exceed 60,000.

The scale of this demographic shock is difficult to overstate, as it effectively places a population nearly equal to the city’s own residents into a confined urban space without adequate preparation for housing, screening, or public order. Reports from the ground describe migrants entering through gaps in border fencing, bypassing coastal defenses, and in some cases swimming into Spanish territory, with footage showing both celebratory scenes upon arrival and confrontations with security forces overwhelmed by the volume of crossings.

Local officials in Ceuta have called for emergency national intervention, including military deployment and reinforced border control, as they confront a situation that has rapidly exceeded municipal capacity. National political discourse, however, continues to emphasize themes of solidarity and inclusion, language that appears increasingly disconnected from the operational reality faced by those responsible for maintaining order on the ground.

This crisis is not an isolated development but part of a long-established migration pattern that I have previously reported on in the region. The geography of Ceuta and Melilla, Spain’s two enclaves on the North African coast, creates a uniquely accessible entry point into Europe, where migrants can reach Spanish jurisdiction not only by sea but also by crossing land barriers that separate the enclaves from Morocco.

During earlier reporting in the region, I encountered individuals who had repeatedly attempted entry despite deportation, including one Algerian migrant who described multiple crossings and returns, driven by the economic disparity between North Africa and Europe. His explanation was straightforward: the opportunity available on the European side of the border represented a level of income and stability that was otherwise unattainable in his country of origin.

This economic imbalance is central to understanding the persistence of migration flows, as individuals from lower-income regions will naturally seek access to higher-income economies when physical proximity makes such movement feasible. While it is important to recognize the human motivations involved, it is equally important to acknowledge that these flows are shaped by policy decisions that determine how easily entry is achieved and how consistently immigration rules are enforced.

Spain’s approach, which has increasingly allowed irregular entrants to remain and eventually regularize their status, creates a system in which initial illegal entry can lead to long-term residence and access to broader European mobility. As a result, Ceuta functions not merely as a local issue but as a gateway into a wider continental migration system.

Migration as a Strategic Tool

There is also a geopolitical dimension to these events that cannot be ignored, as migration flows have at times been influenced by state behavior and used as leverage in diplomatic disputes. In previous incidents involving Spain and Morocco, border enforcement patterns appeared to shift in ways that coincided with political tensions, resulting in sudden surges of crossings that placed immediate pressure on Spanish authorities.

This dynamic reflects a broader reality in which migration can be used as an instrument of statecraft, not through direct military confrontation but through the manipulation of border permeability. Unlike conventional conflict, this form of pressure exploits legal and humanitarian frameworks that make it difficult for receiving countries to respond with force, even when the scale of entry overwhelms administrative capacity.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
When Charity Becomes Self-Destructive: Spain’s Border Crisis Is a Warning to the West When Charity Becomes Self-Destructive: Spain’s Border Crisis Is a Warning to the West

A large and sudden influx of migrants into Spain’s North African enclave of Ceuta has created a situation that should be understood as a broader warning to Western nations that attempt to separate compassion from enforcement, borders, and consequences. Ceuta, a Spanish territory located on the northern coast of Africa and directly adjacent to Morocco, has historically maintained a population of roughly 80,000 people, yet local authorities now report that tens of thousands of migrants have arrived in an extremely short period, with some estimates suggesting the number may exceed 60,000.

The scale of this demographic shock is difficult to overstate, as it effectively places a population nearly equal to the city’s own residents into a confined urban space without adequate preparation for housing, screening, or public order. Reports from the ground describe migrants entering through gaps in border fencing, bypassing coastal defenses, and in some cases swimming into Spanish territory, with footage showing both celebratory scenes upon arrival and confrontations with security forces overwhelmed by the volume of crossings.

Local officials in Ceuta have called for emergency national intervention, including military deployment and reinforced border control, as they confront a situation that has rapidly exceeded municipal capacity. National political discourse, however, continues to emphasize themes of solidarity and inclusion, language that appears increasingly disconnected from the operational reality faced by those responsible for maintaining order on the ground.

This crisis is not an isolated development but part of a long-established migration pattern that I have previously reported on in the region. The geography of Ceuta and Melilla, Spain’s two enclaves on the North African coast, creates a uniquely accessible entry point into Europe, where migrants can reach Spanish jurisdiction not only by sea but also by crossing land barriers that separate the enclaves from Morocco.

During earlier reporting in the region, I encountered individuals who had repeatedly attempted entry despite deportation, including one Algerian migrant who described multiple crossings and returns, driven by the economic disparity between North Africa and Europe. His explanation was straightforward: the opportunity available on the European side of the border represented a level of income and stability that was otherwise unattainable in his country of origin.

This economic imbalance is central to understanding the persistence of migration flows, as individuals from lower-income regions will naturally seek access to higher-income economies when physical proximity makes such movement feasible. While it is important to recognize the human motivations involved, it is equally important to acknowledge that these flows are shaped by policy decisions that determine how easily entry is achieved and how consistently immigration rules are enforced.

Spain’s approach, which has increasingly allowed irregular entrants to remain and eventually regularize their status, creates a system in which initial illegal entry can lead to long-term residence and access to broader European mobility. As a result, Ceuta functions not merely as a local issue but as a gateway into a wider continental migration system.

Migration as a Strategic Tool

There is also a geopolitical dimension to these events that cannot be ignored, as migration flows have at times been influenced by state behavior and used as leverage in diplomatic disputes. In previous incidents involving Spain and Morocco, border enforcement patterns appeared to shift in ways that coincided with political tensions, resulting in sudden surges of crossings that placed immediate pressure on Spanish authorities.

This dynamic reflects a broader reality in which migration can be used as an instrument of statecraft, not through direct military confrontation but through the manipulation of border permeability. Unlike conventional conflict, this form of pressure exploits legal and humanitarian frameworks that make it difficult for receiving countries to respond with force, even when the scale of entry overwhelms administrative capacity.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals