Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Ceasefire or Smokescreen? The Truth Behind Israel's "Truce" with Hezbollah
November 27, 2024
post photo preview

If you’ve been tuning into mainstream news, you might believe a historic ceasefire has brought peace to the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The truth, however, is far more complicated—and far less promising. What’s being heralded as a ceasefire is actually a shaky, one-sided truce, and Hezbollah isn’t even part of the deal. Let’s break down what’s really happening.

What’s Actually Happening?

At its core, this is a 60-day truce involving Israel, the United States, UNIFIL, and the Lebanese government. Notice anyone missing? That’s right—Hezbollah. Despite the fanfare, Hezbollah hasn’t agreed to stop fighting. In fact, they’ve spent the last 48 hours firing over 500 rockets, missiles, and drones into Israel, all while Israel pounds their positions across Lebanon in a pre-truce blitz.

The agreement stipulates that the Lebanese Army will move into southern Lebanon, policing the area south of the Litani River to prevent Hezbollah attacks. But here’s the catch: Hezbollah essentially is the Lebanese Army, or at least half of it. Entrusting them to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure is like asking a fox to guard the henhouse.

Israel’s Terms

Despite its limitations, the deal isn’t a total loss for Israel. Here’s what they gained:

  1. Freedom to Strike: Israel retains the right to respond to threats in Lebanon without prior U.S. approval. While they’ve agreed to alert the U.S. “whenever possible,” they can act unilaterally if needed. This flexibility allows Israel to neutralize immediate threats, such as missile launchers or incoming weapon shipments from Iran.

  2. Continued Surveillance: Israel can keep flying reconnaissance missions over Lebanon, albeit with a promise to avoid sonic booms over Beirut—an intimidation tactic they’ve frequently employed.

  3. Disruption of Iranian Supply Lines: The U.S. committed to helping Israel curb Iran’s weapon shipments into Lebanon, even suggesting American involvement in targeting smuggling routes.

On paper, this gives Israel room to breathe and regroup without sacrificing its security. But the big question remains: will Hezbollah abide by the truce?

Hezbollah’s Reality

Hezbollah is hurting—badly. Over the past few months, Israel has devastated their infrastructure:

  • 80% of Hezbollah’s rockets and missiles have been destroyed or fired.

  • Their command structure has been decimated, with thousands of operatives killed.

  • Entire villages in southern Lebanon, once Hezbollah strongholds, are now ghost towns.

Even Iran, Hezbollah’s main backer, is reportedly urging them to seek a ceasefire. The financial and military toll has been enormous, and Hezbollah’s paranoia is at an all-time high. They’ve allegedly detained—or even executed—over 200 operatives on suspicion of collaborating with Israel.

Why Did Israel Agree to a Truce?

Critics within Israel argue that this is a missed opportunity to finish the job. With Hezbollah on the ropes, some believe Israel should push harder to dismantle them completely, much like its declared goal of eradicating Hamas in Gaza. However, there are strategic reasons behind Israel’s decision:

  1. Focusing Resources: By pausing the northern conflict, Israel can concentrate on Gaza, the West Bank, and its growing standoff with Iran.

  2. Protecting Civilians: Over 60,000 Israelis displaced from their homes in the north could begin returning under the truce’s protection.

  3. International Optics: This deal provides Israel with political capital. If Hezbollah breaks the truce, it exposes their aggression, giving Israel a stronger justification to escalate again.

The U.S. Role

The Biden administration is already taking a victory lap, touting this truce as a diplomatic triumph. But let’s be clear: the U.S. isn’t a neutral player here. By brokering a deal that leans heavily on Israel’s concessions while ignoring Hezbollah’s non-participation, the U.S. appears more concerned with optics than with lasting peace.

And then there’s UNIFIL, the UN peacekeeping force tasked with monitoring southern Lebanon. Historically, UNIFIL has been criticized for its pro-Palestinian bias, raising doubts about its ability—or willingness—to ensure Hezbollah complies. Meanwhile, the U.S. continues funneling hundreds of millions of dollars to the UN despite its consistent failures in conflict zones.

What Happens Next?

This truce is a gamble. If Hezbollah abides, it could signal their desperation and allow Israel to regroup. But if they exploit the situation—using the Litani River as a shield for continued attacks—Israel will have no choice but to resume hostilities. Either way, this conflict is far from over.

For now, the people of northern Israel can hope for a reprieve. But as history has shown, hope isn’t a strategy. And in this region, peace is rarely more than an illusion.

 

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
11
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Is the U.S. Training Syria’s New Jihadist Army?

Very few media outlets are talking about this, but they should be — urgently.

While most of the world is distracted, U.S. troops are conducting live training exercises in Syria with the forces of the country’s new interim government, now led by Ahmed al-Sharaa — a man widely known as a former Al Qaeda affiliate.

Let that sink in.

Recent reports confirm that U.S. personnel at the Al-Tanf garrison have been training members of the so-called 70th Division, a unit formed from remnants of the Syrian Free Army, which now pledges loyalty to this new government. This comes right on the heels of a massacre of Druze civilians, allegedly carried out by those very same government-aligned forces.

Aiding the Next Generation of Jihadists?
This isn’t just a questionable policy — it could be morally catastrophic.

Druze communities, who have long sought neutrality in Syria’s civil war, were brutally attacked.

Christian populations in the region are living in fear, as radical factions become emboldened ...

00:06:03
Debunked

Debunked: Following several accusations that Israel is causing famine in Gaza, COGAT has released drone footage of the hundreds of truckloads of supplies waiting to be delivered to Gaza by the UN. A statement accompanying the footage claims that 'There is enough food here to feed all of Gaza, if the UN ever came to pick it up.

00:00:39
Did Jewish Settlers Burn a Church?

See for yourself

00:02:32
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
The Hot Zone Hit 200k Subscribers!

We just passed 200000 subscribers on YouTube! If you've ever shared a video, left a comment, or prayed over this work, thank you. I don’t take it lightly. This channel exists to bring truth and to make the news better, and it is made possible by all of you. Thank you!

post photo preview
Interview With Freed Israeli Hostage Mia Shem.

Lest we forget why Israel is fighting daily to bring their people home and protect against further atrocities, Mia Shem’s story is a sobering reminder of what’s at stake.

Sad truth = Death of Civilization
Don’t be the 4th monkey!!

post photo preview
post photo preview
Israel at a Crossroads: Conquer, Besiege, or Capitulate?

Hey folks, Chuck Holton here—coming to you one last time from this balcony in Jerusalem before I head to Tel Aviv and then on to the next frontlines. But before I leave, I want to break down some of the most critical developments from the past week in Gaza and beyond. And believe me, there's a lot to unpack.

Three Roads for Israel

Let’s talk strategy. An analysis in Israel Hayom outlines three main options Israel faces in Gaza:

  1. Conquer Gaza: Full military occupation, boots on the ground, control every inch. But that comes at a high cost—thousands of IDF troops deployed indefinitely.

  2. Besiege Gaza: Maintain pressure without full occupation. This could include arming anti-Hamas factions—like Abu Salai’s clan in Rafah—and continuing selective strikes.

  3. Status Quo: Keep doing what they’re doing—limited incursions, hostage negotiations, and intelligence gathering. But this risks being perceived as weak and prolonging the conflict indefinitely.

As I said on Newsmax, the idea of a ceasefire right now is fantasy. Hamas still believes it’s winning—happy to let their people starve if they can pin the blame on Israel. President Trump nailed it:

“You’re gonna have to fight. You’re gonna have to clean it up. You’re gonna have to get rid of them.”

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Feeding the Hungry—or Fueling the Narrative? What’s Really Stopping Aid in Gaza

Just inside the border fence between Israel and Gaza, 950 trucks loaded with humanitarian aid are parked in neat rows—each one carrying enough food to feed 5,000 people. That’s nearly 4.7 million meals sitting idle in the blistering sun, not because they can’t be delivered, but because the United Nations refuses to distribute them. The reason? Doing so would mean cooperating with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and apparently, political posturing takes priority over feeding the hungry.

 

I was there. I saw the trucks. I spoke with the IDF officers overseeing the process. The KM Shalom distribution yard is not a ghost town—it's an active, secure checkpoint where aid is being processed, inspected, and prepared for delivery. The Israeli military has opened the door for humanitarian efforts to operate safely. But the UN has effectively slammed it shut, choosing ideological purity over practical compassion.

The prevailing media narrative often accuses Israel of “blocking aid” into Gaza. But here’s the truth on the ground: Israel isn’t blocking humanitarian aid—Hamas is looting it, and the UN is refusing to cooperate to ensure it gets where it needs to go. In the absence of leadership from the world’s largest humanitarian body, smaller organizations have taken up the mantle.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Why Are Thailand and Cambodia Suddenly at War?
What Americans Should Know


By Chuck Holton | July 25, 2025


What's Happening

Fighting has broken out along the border between Thailand and Cambodia, two countries in Southeast Asia. At least 14 people are dead, over 100,000 civilians have been displaced, and both sides are using heavy weapons — including jets, rockets, and artillery.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals