America's Fires
Does he think that no one can overcome him..??
Does he think!!
When a hurricane meets fire
It is the power of God Almighty mentioned in the Holy Quran 1400 years ago
God Almighty says: (Then a hurricane struck it with fire in it, and it was burned. Thus does God make clear to you the signs that you may give thought)
This used to be the most expensive real estate area in the world in the state of California in the American city of Los Angeles,
Now it has become chaff blown away by the winds.
Allah the Almighty says in His perfect revelation:
“Until, when the earth has taken on its ornaments and is beautified, and its people think that they have power over it, Our command comes to it by night or by day, and We make it a harvest.”
The cost of rebuilding Gaza after 445 days
= $80 billion
The cost of rebuilding America after 4 days = $150 billion
Allah the Almighty said: “We will gradually lead them on from where they do not know. And I will grant them respite. Indeed, My plan is firm.” || Al-A'raf: 182-183
And God Almighty said: {And the Day when those who disbelieved will be exposed to the Fire, [it will be said], "You consumed your good things in your worldly life and enjoyed them. So today you will be recompensed with the punishment of humiliation for what you used to be arrogant in your worldly life."
In a powerful 90-second speech before the United Nations Human Rights Council, Syrian-Lebanese activist Rawan Osman shattered the prevailing anti-Israel narrative, calling out the hypocrisy of Arab regimes that fuel terrorism while condemning Israel.
Osman, who has visited Israel nine times since October 7, boldly declared: “I testify before God: Israel is not the problem.”
She reminded the world of the brutal murder of Israeli hostage Shiri Bibas and her children, Ariel and Kfir, who were choked to death in Gaza—while Hamas deceitfully claimed they had only been “arrested.”
Then, she turned her attention to the Arab states:
Qatar: Why do you shelter Hamas leaders in Doha instead of arresting them and demanding the release of hostages?
Iran: Why do you fund Hamas and Hezbollah while your own people suffer in poverty?
Egypt: How can you charge desperate Gazans thousands of dollars to flee the war, then claim moral authority?
Jordan: Why refuse to accept any Gazans—are they ...
But it’s a rumor floating around….
Hillel Fuld:
Israel had intel that people are planning to sail to Gaza on ships to protest the war. Defense minister Katz announced that he will take those protesters off the ships, put them in Gaza, then use the ship to transport Gazans out of Gaza. Freakin brilliant! ⛴️
Donald Trump’s assertive and outspoken manner is drawing notice from U.S. allies. Per a March 6, 2025, Israel Hayom report, Israel is contemplating reduced intelligence sharing with the U.S., citing concerns over Trump’s Russia ties and possible data exposure risks.
Other allies, like the "Five Eyes" group, also appear unsettled by his global positions. This suggests Trump’s style might be prompting a rethink among key partners, with effects on established ties still unfolding.
What should the US reaction be?
Voluntary Emigration: Israel has begun allowing convoys of ambulances to remove wounded and ill Gazans from Gaza. The Prime Minister's Office would not say whether they had been wounded fighting Israel, but noted that it was part of the plan to empty Gaza proposed by President Trump.
𝗜𝗦𝗥𝗔𝗘𝗟 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦
https://chat.whatsapp.com/LZ1sG01dWUb29bhz16LXQF
In one of the biggest infrastructure deals in recent history, BlackRock and its partners have purchased control of the Panama Ports Company (PPC) for $22.8 billion, taking over the management of two critical ports at either end of the Panama Canal. The deal removes Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings, a company with deep connections to China, from managing these ports—seemingly a win for U.S. influence in the region.
But while this deal shifts control away from a China-linked company, it also hands even more power to BlackRock, a massive investment firm that already has an outsized role in shaping global business and government policies. The question we should be asking is: Does this really reduce foreign influence in Panama, or does it just transfer it to a different kind of global giant?
BlackRock isn’t just another investment firm—it’s the largest asset manager in the world, controlling a staggering $11.5 trillion in assets. To put that into perspective:
But BlackRock doesn’t just invest—it influences. Through its vast holdings in publicly traded companies, it has the ability to push corporate policies, steer industries, and even shape government decisions. This power has led to concerns that BlackRock is a shadow government in its own right, accountable only to itself and its shareholders.
BlackRock’s takeover of the Panama Canal’s key ports isn’t just about business—it’s about geopolitics. These ports control much of the traffic passing through one of the world’s most strategic waterways, giving whoever manages them an enormous advantage in global trade.
The buyout does remove CK Hutchison Holdings, a company with ties to China, which has eased concerns from U.S. policymakers about potential Chinese espionage or military use of the ports. But here’s the catch:
So while this deal shifts control away from China-linked Hutchison, it doesn’t eliminate China’s influence—it just redistributes power in a different way.
While BlackRock isn’t a foreign government, its power is just as concerning in many ways. Here’s why:
💰 With $11.5 trillion in assets, BlackRock manages more wealth than every country in the world except the U.S. and China.
🏢 BlackRock owns significant shares in Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and nearly every Fortune 500 company.
📝 Because of its massive holdings, BlackRock can push companies to adopt policies aligned with its goals—whether it’s on climate, diversity, or governance.
🏛️ Former BlackRock executives have held top positions in the Biden administration, leading to accusations of a “revolving door” between Wall Street and Washington.
🏠 BlackRock has invested billions in real estate, buying up homes and raising housing prices for regular people.
🌍 BlackRock promotes “Environmental, Social, and Governance” (ESG) policies, influencing corporate decisions on climate and diversity—whether investors agree or not.
🕵️ Unlike elected governments, BlackRock is accountable only to itself and its investors, not to the public.
🚢 The Panama ports deal is part of a larger BlackRock strategy to buy up critical infrastructure, including power plants and railways.
📉 By pulling investments from certain industries (like fossil fuels), BlackRock can steer entire economies—without voters having a say.
🌐 Because BlackRock manages pension funds and government assets, even world leaders have to consider its interests.
Yes, this deal prevents a China-linked company from running the Panama Canal’s major ports, and that’s a big deal. But at what cost? We’ve simply shifted control from one foreign influence to another—one that’s just as powerful but far less accountable.
China isn’t really losing ground in Latin America—it still has deep economic roots in Panama and beyond. Meanwhile, BlackRock continues to grow its empire, quietly amassing influence over global commerce, national economies, and even government policies.
This deal might be a strategic move for U.S. influence in the region, but it also raises serious concerns about corporate power, economic sovereignty, and the unchecked influence of global finance. If BlackRock keeps expanding its control over strategic assets like ports, energy, and infrastructure, we may soon find ourselves in a world where corporations—not countries—set the rules of global trade and governance.
So while this is a win for the U.S. government, it may also be a step toward an even bigger problem: the concentration of global power in the hands of a few unelected corporate giants.
🔹 The question we should all be asking: If BlackRock already has more financial influence than most countries, how much more control are we willing to give it?
The fragile 42-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas officially collapsed Saturday night after negotiations for a second phase failed to materialize. Hamas rejected any extension of the ceasefire unless it resulted in a full Israeli withdrawal and an end to military operations—conditions Israel was never going to accept.
Israel attempted to negotiate a compromise through U.S. presidential advisor Steve Witkoff, proposing that Hamas release half of the remaining hostages—including all deceased captives—before entering into discussions about a second phase. The second phase would have included further hostage releases and a shift toward de-escalation. However, Hamas refused to engage, effectively pushing Israel back into full-scale military operations.
Israel is showing no signs of backing down, with ten brigades positioned around Gaza and prepared for extended military operations. Reports indicate that Israel has no intention of pulling out until its objectives are met—namely, the complete decimation of Hamas' military capabilities.
A recently approved $3.5 billion U.S. weapons sale to Israel includes 35,000 Mark 84 bombs, each capable of leveling buildings with a blast radius of four football fields. Additionally, 300 D9 Caterpillar bulldozers—massive machines capable of demolishing infrastructure—are being added to the Israeli arsenal. These purchases indicate that Israel is preparing for a more destructive phase of operations in Gaza.
Meanwhile, Israel continues to face near-daily terrorist attacks. In Haifa, a 70-year-old man was killed in a stabbing attack inside a shopping mall, with several others injured before the attacker was neutralized. The assailant had recently returned from abroad before launching his assault. These attacks only serve to reinforce Israel’s resolve to eliminate threats within and outside its borders.
While military operations continue, Israel is also battling a war of perception. International criticism over humanitarian aid restrictions has intensified, but Israel argues that Hamas is hoarding four to six months' worth of supplies in warehouses while claiming the population is starving. By cutting off aid, Israel is effectively putting pressure on Hamas to use its stockpiles or face responsibility for the suffering of Gazan civilians.
With Trump’s administration providing unwavering support, Israel now has a freer hand to execute its military strategy without political interference from Washington. Analysts predict that
, seeking to dismantle Hamas’ remaining strongholds. Meanwhile, tensions along the Lebanese borderremain high, with ongoing Israeli strikes targeting Hezbollah assets.
The next phase of this war appears to be a decisive push to eradicate Hamas—both militarily and structurally. The Israeli government seems committed to ensuring that Gaza is no longer a launching ground for future conflicts, even if that means completely reshaping the region.
Stay tuned for further updates as this situation continues to unfold.