Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
The Alaska Summit: Theater, Sanctions, and What It Means for Ukraine
August 17, 2025
post photo preview

I’m writing to you today from the mountains of Kazakhstan. It’s been a whirlwind few days out here in Central Asia, and I’ve been watching closely as history played out thousands of miles away in Alaska. I want to break down for you what happened at the first U.S.-Russia presidential summit since the war in Ukraine began — and why the optics may be very different from the reality.

 

Pomp Without Circumstance

Two days ago, President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met at Joint Base Elmendorf in Alaska. This was the first time the two men had been face-to-face in a decade, and the event was choreographed to the hilt. Red carpet, honor guards, F-22 Raptors on the tarmac, and even a flyover by B-2 stealth bombers — all staged to project American strength.

But what did we actually get from it? Not much. It was political theater — smiles, handshakes, and photo ops. The summit ended abruptly with no lunch, no press questions, and only carefully scripted remarks. That alone should tell you the talks didn’t go as well as advertised.

 

Putin’s Win on Sanctions

So why did Putin make the trip? One word: sanctions. The Trump administration had been preparing to roll out secondary sanctions — penalties not only on Russia, but also on countries like India and China that have been helping Moscow skirt existing restrictions. These measures had the potential to choke off Russia’s war machine, because while Putin doesn’t mind sacrificing soldiers, he does mind losing the economic lifeline that fuels his military.

At the end of the day, Putin walked away without making a single concession — but he did secure at least a delay on those secondary sanctions. That’s a huge win for Moscow. No wonder Russians are celebrating this summit as a victory.

Meanwhile, Ukraine is in the best battlefield position it has been since the war started. They’ve got more than 750,000 men under arms, and they’ve learned to innovate at lightning speed — fielding drones, unmanned vehicles, and even remote casualty evacuation systems that save soldiers’ lives.

Russian tactics, on the other hand, remain rooted in old Soviet-style warfare: meat waves of troops, staggering casualties, and little innovation beyond drones. Every square kilometer they seize costs them hundreds of dead soldiers.

And here’s a fact you won’t hear on mainstream news: Ukraine is now producing more ammunition than it consumes. They’re no longer entirely dependent on Western supplies. That’s a game changer.

 

Optics vs. Reality

Here’s what worries me: the optics of this summit play directly into Russia’s cognitive warfare doctrine. Moscow believes wars are won by shaping minds, not just by winning on the battlefield. Optics are the battlefield.

Putin, riding in “the Beast” limousine, smiling alongside Trump, Lavrov wearing a USSR sweatshirt — those images tell the world Russia is on equal footing with the United States. That perception is a victory in itself, even if the reality is that Russia’s economy is crumbling and their military is bleeding men at an unsustainable rate.

 

The Human Cost

I also want to remind you what’s at stake here. Russia has abducted tens of thousands of Ukrainian children, rebranded them as Russian, and in some cases sent them to fight against their own countrymen. They’ve run “filtration” camps in occupied Ukraine, separating families, torturing civilians, and disappearing countless people.

I’ve seen the aftermath of these atrocities firsthand. In places like Bucha and Mariupol, Russia’s brutality is real and ongoing. This is why Ukraine refuses to accept any “peace deal” that leaves its people in Russian hands.

For Russia, the summit was a public relations victory and a temporary reprieve from crippling sanctions. For the U.S., it was a show without substance. And for Ukraine, it was yet another reminder that their fate is often being negotiated without them at the table.

If the United States truly wants to end this war, the most effective way is still maximum economic pressure — cutting off Russia’s oil revenues and enforcing secondary sanctions without hesitation. That’s the lever that will eventually break the Kremlin’s grip.

 

You can watch the full video on this topic HERE

 

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
16
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 18, 2025
Benjamin Netanyahu Explains the Israeli Economy

Netanyahu was once Israeli Finance Minister - and it shows. He understands a lot about economics, and is worth listening to in order to get a sense for where Israel's economy is headed.

00:08:49
September 12, 2025
Video of Kirk’s Killer

BREAKING: The FBI and state of Utah have just released video of the Charlie Kirk kiIIer escaping from the scene following the shooting

He jumped off the rooftop, moved quickly through the parking lot, and then began walking casually to blend in before entering a wooded area.

He was wearing converse tennis shoes, a shirt with an eagle, and a baseball cap with a triangle.

00:00:43
September 07, 2025
Houthi Drone Strikes Israel - Two Wounded

Three Houthi drones were fired at Israel on Sunday. Two were shot down and the third struck the airport in Eilat, Wounding to his Israelis and causing the airspace to be shut down.

00:00:07
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
September 26, 2025
September 25, 2025
The Church Is Not a Hiding Place for Evil

There is a sickness in the Church today that we cannot ignore any longer. It's the culture of cover-up. The idea that protecting a ministry's reputation is more important than protecting the vulnerable. That confronting evil within the camp somehow threatens the work of God. That’s not biblical. That’s cowardice.

The man being exposed in this video—a well-known evangelist working in Central and South America—has even been connected to my own church. That hits close to home. And I want to say publicly that I’m proud of my pastor, Nick, for standing up for the victims and refusing to stay silent. That kind of courage is rare, and it’s exactly what the Church needs right now.

You may not know this man or any of the people involved. But that doesn’t mean this doesn’t concern you. It’s important to recognize the signs of abuse and manipulation in the Church so that when we see it, we can stand against it—clearly, boldly, and without hesitation.

If we say we follow Christ, then ...

September 26, 2025
September is National Preparedness Month
post photo preview
What REAL Famine Looks Like

In 1932-1933 there was a man made famine created by the Soviet Union in Ukraine named the Holodomor. This is what man-made famine looks like, when you could be shot for taking a handful of grain, not having the ones you hate ship literal tons of supplies to you like what we are seeing in Gaza.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
All Hands to Quantico: Why 800 U.S. Generals Were Summoned—and What It Could Mean

The Extraordinary Roll-Call

The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, just ordered every U.S. general officer—we’re talking admirals and generals across the services, more than 800 flag officers—to report to Quantico, Virginia next week. The meeting isn’t secret; the agenda is. That alone is historic. Add the entourages, staffers, security, and aircrews and you’re looking at several thousand people converging on one secure base.

Let’s be clear: everything beyond the fact of the meeting is speculation until we hear otherwise. But the scale and timing are hard to ignore.

Plausible Reasons (from Most Boring to Biggest Stakes)

  1. New Strategy Rollout. The simplest explanation is often right. Hegseth may be announcing a sweeping defense concept—a pivot to homeland defense while re-framing how we handle overseas threats.

  2. Top-Heavy Cleanup. The force has become too bureaucratic and bloated at the top. Streamlining combatant commands and trimming hundreds of billets wouldn’t shock me.

  3. Operational Security Briefing. If leadership worries about hacks and leaks, you bring people behind a SCIF door and talk face-to-face.

  4. Imminent Threat Coordination. Less likely, but not zero: warnings about coordinated, multi-front risks—from terror plots to state-actor provocations—requiring synchronized posture across the services.

The media chatter about a “loyalty oath” or a “coup” is nonsense. This isn’t about pledging to a man; it’s about returning the military to merit and mission.

 

 Russia Pushes, NATO Watches the Clock

If the world feels jumpy, that’s because it is.

  • Drone incursions and fighter-jet stunts: Russian aircraft have probed NATO airspace and the Alaska ADIZ, sometimes flying low and deliberately provocative. The goal isn’t just theater—it’s timing our response.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
September 24, 2025
What 157 Flags for “Palestine” Really Mean (and Don’t)

157 Countries “Recognize Palestine”

According to the latest tally, 157 UN member states—about 81% of the General Assembly—now recognize a Palestinian state (framed along 1967 lines: West Bank/Judea & Samaria, Gaza, and East Jerusalem with land swaps). That vote doesn’t grant UN membership (the U.S. vetoed that push at the Security Council), but it is a wave of diplomatic theater.

Countries that recognize the state of Palestine
Countries recognizing the State of Palestine

Let’s be clear:

  • On the ground, nothing changes. Israel still controls its borders; the Palestinian Authority controls scattered zones in the West Bank; Hamas still rules Gaza by force.

  • In the halls of international bodies, recognition amplifies lawfare—more podium time, more resolutions and filings at the ICJ/ICC targeting Israel. Symbolic isolation rises; security reality does not.

“Recognition” without governance, borders, or a unified leadership isn’t statehood; it’s virtue signaling.

Why Some Countries Said Yes—and Why Others Didn’t

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals