Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Where Did All the Protesters Go?
Reflecting on the 2025 Inauguration
January 20, 2025
post photo preview

I’ll admit it—I was wrong. Heading into the 2025 presidential inauguration, I fully expected a repeat of the chaos I witnessed in 2017. Back then, during Trump’s first swearing-in, the streets of Washington, D.C., were a battleground. Thousands of protesters clashed with police, smashed windows, torched cars, and left a trail of destruction that resulted in hundreds of arrests. It was a spectacle of outrage and unrest.

Watch Chuck Get Attacked By Hammer-Wielding Antifa in 2017

But this year? Almost nothing.

Sure, there were a handful of protesters—mostly of the fringe variety, like Westboro Baptist Church-types. But the scene was eerily calm. What’s more, it didn’t seem like it had to be. Despite the presence of 27,000 police and National Guard troops, 30 miles of fencing, and a fleet of trucks blocking roads, the anticipated storm never came. Why?

1. It Was Freezing

First off, it was 20 degrees. Let’s face it, bitter cold puts a damper on almost any outdoor event, even protests. But cold alone doesn’t explain the dramatic difference between this inauguration and 2017. After all, people braved the weather to raise havoc eight years ago.

2. Follow the Money?

The Guardian offers another intriguing possibility. In 2017, protests were organized and funded by a coalition of activist groups galvanized by Trump’s election. The anger was fresh, and the resources were abundant. This time around, those same groups may not have the same motivation—or the money—to pull off a repeat performance.

Political movements, especially large-scale protests, don’t materialize out of thin air. They require organization, funding, and a spark of collective outrage. It’s possible that the organizations that helped fuel the 2017 protests have dissolved or shifted focus. Or maybe the polarization that defined the Trump era has softened, leaving fewer people feeling angry enough to take to the streets.

3. Guardrails That Worked

Another factor might be the sheer scale of security. With tens of thousands of law enforcement officers and miles of barriers, even the most committed agitators may have been discouraged. The overwhelming show of force sent a clear message: not this time.

4. A Changing Political Climate

Finally, the broader political climate might have shifted. While America is still divided, the outrage that defined much of Trump’s presidency has evolved. People may be fatigued by years of constant political conflict, or they’ve found other outlets for their grievances.

A Quiet Surprise

In the end, I was prepared for mass unrest, and I got an orderly transition of power instead. It’s a pleasant surprise, but it leaves plenty of questions. Was it the cold? The security? A lack of funding and organization? Or is America, in its own way, starting to move past the need for protests that escalate into chaos?

Only time will tell whether this peace will hold (I'd like to be optimistic), but one thing is certain—this inauguration was a reminder that predictions, like protests, don’t always materialize the way you expect.

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
40
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Bringing dignity to imprisoned women

I’m in Cartagena and yesterday we went to the women’s prison here to bring some much-needed necessities to the ladies and give them the gospel of the good news of Jesus Christ. It was a powerful time. I’m very glad I got a chance to do this. Thank you to all of you who donated to help these women. They are truly “the least of these “.

00:00:19
Day 2 Syria
00:01:36
Disney Land for Men in Iraq.
00:00:57
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Calling Young Men to Lead: Join The Forge This Summer

We’re launching our very first Forge Field Leadership Camp this summer!

The Forge is a one-week, field-based camp for young men (ages 13–17), built on a biblical foundation. It’s designed to train real-world skills—navigation, survival, building, leadership—while shaping character, discipline, and faith.

This is more than a summer camp. It’s a call to rise.

Led by veterans and experienced mentors, these young men will be challenged to grow stronger in every way—physically, mentally, and spiritually.

Dates: August 2–9
Ages: 13–17
Apply now: https://www.frontierforge.org/

post photo preview
A New Milestone!
post photo preview
Car Explosion Outside U.S. Embassy in Yerevan Sparks Fire, Investigation Underway

YEREVAN, Armenia — February 19, 2026
A vehicle exploded outside the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Armenia, this evening, prompting a significant fire and emergency response from local authorities, according to multiple eyewitness reports and local media.

Around 6:00 p.m. local time, a car reportedly exploded on Isakov Avenue, directly in front of the U.S. Embassy compound in Armenia’s capital. The blast was powerful enough to ignite a large fire that was visible from surrounding blocks and drew firefighters and police to the scene.
Video posted on social media shows flames and smoke rising from the area of the explosion, and emergency services were at the location within minutes.

At this time, no official statement has been released by the U.S. Embassy or Armenian government regarding the cause of the explosion, possible casualties, or whether the incident was deliberate. Authorities are currently investigating.
Embassies typically have robust security perimeters, and there is no confirmed...

post photo preview
Live Call TOMORROW
Our live call is this Saturday, February 21st at 12:00 PM Eastern.

Local’s members,

Our live call is this Saturday, February 21st at 12:00 PM Eastern.

Chuck just returned from Colombia and Syria and will be taking your questions—covering everything from ministry work on the ground in Colombia to the evolving geopolitical situation overseas. This is your chance to go deeper and hear directly from him.

He’ll also be sharing more about the upcoming Frontier Forge Institute summer camp, including its mission to train young men (ages 13–17) in Christian leadership, discipline, and responsibility. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Mercy on the Ground, War on the Horizon

The conflict between the United States and Iran is doing that strange dance right now. On one hand, you’ve got “negotiations” in Geneva. On the other hand… you’ve got aircraft carriers moving.

Axios reported this morning that we may be closer to striking Iran than most people realize. Not months. Not “someday.” Possibly days. And if you watch the hardware, it tells a clearer story than the press releases.

In just the last 48 hours, reports indicate the U.S. has surged:

  • 48 F-16s

  • 12 F-22s

  • 18 F-35s

  • 6 E-3G Sentry AWACS aircraft

  • Roughly 40 aerial refueling tankers

Meanwhile, the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group has passed the Rock of Gibraltar and entered the Mediterranean.

And here’s what most people don’t understand:

That carrier does not have to sail into the Strait of Hormuz to be useful.

From the eastern Mediterranean—especially with tanker support—U.S. aircraft can strike targets inside Iran. Which means this could kick off before the Ford ever gets to the Gulf.

These “Talks” Aren’t Really Talks

The negotiations happening in Geneva aren’t face-to-face. There’s no American official sitting across a table from the Ayatollah. It’s shuttle diplomacy.

Omani intermediaries walk between rooms—one room with American envoys, another with Iranian representatives—carrying messages back and forth.

The U.S. says:
“You must give up highly enriched uranium and abandon your nuclear ambitions.”

Iran says:
“We’re willing to talk.”

And then quietly:
“Just not about that.”

That’s not negotiation.

And while the delay continues, the Ayatollah is publicly threatening to sink American carriers, calling them “big targets.”

Can Iran Sink a Carrier?

Let’s be serious for a moment. Yes, Iran has hypersonic missiles. Yes, they have thousands of short-range missiles designed to threaten neighbors like Saudi Arabia. Yes, they have speedboats with guns and some small submarines.

But here’s the problem for them:

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Iran’s Threat Videos, America’s Buildup, and the Question Nobody Wants to Answer

Right now, the nuclear talks in Geneva are stalling with Iran. Meanwhile, the United States is building combat power in the region at a level we haven’t seen since the Iraq invasion—two aircraft carriers, dozens of warships, hundreds of combat aircraft, and tens of thousands of troops either in theater or moving that direction.

 

The U.S. buildup is not subtle—and Iran knows it

From what I’m tracking, the U.S. is moving into the region with:

  • Two carrier strike groups (one already in theater and another inbound)

  • 300–400 combat jets in the region when you count land-based aircraft

  • Patriot and THAAD batteries shifting into place

  • Aegis destroyers tuned for ballistic missile defense

  • A steady stream of support aircraft—tankers, ISR platforms, and the stuff you don’t talk about on a public livestream

And here’s the point: the United States isn’t putting all that out there to “negotiate harder.” That’s the kind of posture you take when you want your opponent to understand the consequences before you act.

Iran’s information war just leveled up (and yes, the video was impressive)

Iran has been pumping out threat videos for weeks—straight of Hormuz posturing, military drills, the whole production.

But they dropped one recently that honestly looks like a Super Bowl ad for ballistic missiles.

And I’ll say this plainly: it was well-made. Whoever is building their media operation understands modern influence warfare. The goal isn’t just to scare Israel—it’s to scare Americans, spook markets, pressure allies, and make decision-makers hesitate.

The missile they’re showcasing is the Khoramshahr-4 (they’re pitching it as unstoppable, “uninterceptable,” and essentially a war-ending weapon).

So let’s talk about what it can do—and what it can’t.

Khoramshahr-4: a serious threat, but not a war-winner

From the way this missile is being described, it’s a liquid-fueled, medium-range system with roughly 2,000 km range—meaning Israel is in reach, U.S. bases in the region are in reach, and potentially some assets farther out are threatened depending on basing and launch options.

The real concern isn’t just speed. The concern is maneuverability on re-entry—a re-entry vehicle that can adjust course makes interception harder.

But here’s the part that matters strategically:

  • A weapon can be terrifying and still not be decisive.

  • A missile can get through sometimes and still not win the war.

Even if Iran had a significant number of these—and even if a percentage penetrated defenses—that’s not enough to defeat the combined combat power the U.S. and Israel can bring to bear.

Iran can cause damage. Iran can kill people. Iran can make the cost real.

But Iran cannot win a conventional war against the U.S. and Israel.

That’s why they’re leaning so heavily into the psychological side: if you can’t win the fight, you try to prevent the fight.

The Strait of Hormuz threat has a problem: China

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals