
Musa Abdraim, a 52-year-old retired boxer and father of five, stepped in to save a 21-year-old female security officer from a knife-wielding attacker at Almaty Airport, Kazakhstan—and he did it with his bare hands.
The terrifying standoff erupted at the airport security checkpoint when a 67-year-old man refused to show his ID.
Suddenly, he pulled out a knife, grabbed security officer Botagoz Mukhtarova by the hair, and pressed the blade against her throat. He then claimed to have a bomb, threatening to detonate it using his phone.
Passengers and security personnel looked on in shock. The scene was pure chaos. But in the middle of the panic, one man stepped forward.
Abdraim, who had just arrived at the airport to see off family members, immediately assessed the danger and acted. With no hesitation, Abdraim offered himself as a replacement hostage.
"Take me instead," he told the attacker.
To everyone’s surprise, the knifeman agreed, releasing the young woman and grabbing Abdraim.
This ...
In a powerful 90-second speech before the United Nations Human Rights Council, Syrian-Lebanese activist Rawan Osman shattered the prevailing anti-Israel narrative, calling out the hypocrisy of Arab regimes that fuel terrorism while condemning Israel.
Osman, who has visited Israel nine times since October 7, boldly declared: “I testify before God: Israel is not the problem.”
She reminded the world of the brutal murder of Israeli hostage Shiri Bibas and her children, Ariel and Kfir, who were choked to death in Gaza—while Hamas deceitfully claimed they had only been “arrested.”
Then, she turned her attention to the Arab states:
Qatar: Why do you shelter Hamas leaders in Doha instead of arresting them and demanding the release of hostages?
Iran: Why do you fund Hamas and Hezbollah while your own people suffer in poverty?
Egypt: How can you charge desperate Gazans thousands of dollars to flee the war, then claim moral authority?
Jordan: Why refuse to accept any Gazans—are they ...
But it’s a rumor floating around….
Hillel Fuld:
Israel had intel that people are planning to sail to Gaza on ships to protest the war. Defense minister Katz announced that he will take those protesters off the ships, put them in Gaza, then use the ship to transport Gazans out of Gaza. Freakin brilliant! ⛴️
Iran has reportedly ordered its 12 proxy groups worldwide to prepare for war against Israel and the United States, signaling that Tehran expects a major strike against its nuclear program. This escalation has global implications, but let’s break down what it really means.
Iran’s most well-known proxy, Hezbollah, has been significantly weakened after months of intense fighting with Israel. Reports indicate that Hezbollah has suffered heavy losses and is struggling to regroup. Financially, it’s also taken a hit—just days ago, $2.5 million in cash being flown into Beirut was intercepted.
But Hezbollah is just one piece of the puzzle. Iran is also ramping up support for:
However, the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) may be Iran’s most critical focus right now. Israel has been intercepting shipments of weapons and explosives smuggled through Jordan—some as heavy-duty as anti-tank rockets, machine guns, and Claymore mines. This could indicate that a new front is being prepared inside Israel itself.
Iran’s sudden call to arms suggests Tehran believes an attack is coming—and for good reason. Both Israel and the U.S.have openly discussed the threat of Iran’s nuclear program, and now, the Pentagon has approved a massive arms saleto Israel, including 35,000 Mark 84 bombs.
These 2,000-pound bombs can flatten entire buildings and penetrate 10 feet of reinforced concrete—but not deep enough to destroy Iran’s fortified nuclear sites. The only weapon capable of such destruction is the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 30,000-pound bunker buster—which can only be carried by U.S. B-2 stealth bombers.
The U.S. has recently moved B-52 bombers into the Middle East and flown missions over the region—a classic intimidation tactic. If an attack is coming, Israel would likely need direct U.S. military involvement.
While much of the world focuses on Gaza, the situation in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) is growing more volatile. The IDF has been conducting near-daily counterterror raids there, uncovering major weapons stockpiles meant for attacks inside Israel. If Iran has its way, the next phase of this war won’t be fought across borders—but inside Israel itself.
Hamas, for its part, has issued an ultimatum: No more hostage releases until Israel completely withdraws from Gaza.Israel, of course, has zero intention of doing that—which means more fighting is almost inevitable.
With Iran calling on its proxies, Hamas refusing to release hostages, and Israel arming up for a major battle, this war is far from over. Whether a direct U.S.-Israeli strike on Iran actually happens remains to be seen—but one thing is clear: the conflict is only intensifying.
In one of the biggest infrastructure deals in recent history, BlackRock and its partners have purchased control of the Panama Ports Company (PPC) for $22.8 billion, taking over the management of two critical ports at either end of the Panama Canal. The deal removes Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings, a company with deep connections to China, from managing these ports—seemingly a win for U.S. influence in the region.
But while this deal shifts control away from a China-linked company, it also hands even more power to BlackRock, a massive investment firm that already has an outsized role in shaping global business and government policies. The question we should be asking is: Does this really reduce foreign influence in Panama, or does it just transfer it to a different kind of global giant?
BlackRock isn’t just another investment firm—it’s the largest asset manager in the world, controlling a staggering $11.5 trillion in assets. To put that into perspective:
But BlackRock doesn’t just invest—it influences. Through its vast holdings in publicly traded companies, it has the ability to push corporate policies, steer industries, and even shape government decisions. This power has led to concerns that BlackRock is a shadow government in its own right, accountable only to itself and its shareholders.
BlackRock’s takeover of the Panama Canal’s key ports isn’t just about business—it’s about geopolitics. These ports control much of the traffic passing through one of the world’s most strategic waterways, giving whoever manages them an enormous advantage in global trade.
The buyout does remove CK Hutchison Holdings, a company with ties to China, which has eased concerns from U.S. policymakers about potential Chinese espionage or military use of the ports. But here’s the catch:
So while this deal shifts control away from China-linked Hutchison, it doesn’t eliminate China’s influence—it just redistributes power in a different way.
While BlackRock isn’t a foreign government, its power is just as concerning in many ways. Here’s why:
💰 With $11.5 trillion in assets, BlackRock manages more wealth than every country in the world except the U.S. and China.
🏢 BlackRock owns significant shares in Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and nearly every Fortune 500 company.
📝 Because of its massive holdings, BlackRock can push companies to adopt policies aligned with its goals—whether it’s on climate, diversity, or governance.
🏛️ Former BlackRock executives have held top positions in the Biden administration, leading to accusations of a “revolving door” between Wall Street and Washington.
🏠 BlackRock has invested billions in real estate, buying up homes and raising housing prices for regular people.
🌍 BlackRock promotes “Environmental, Social, and Governance” (ESG) policies, influencing corporate decisions on climate and diversity—whether investors agree or not.
🕵️ Unlike elected governments, BlackRock is accountable only to itself and its investors, not to the public.
🚢 The Panama ports deal is part of a larger BlackRock strategy to buy up critical infrastructure, including power plants and railways.
📉 By pulling investments from certain industries (like fossil fuels), BlackRock can steer entire economies—without voters having a say.
🌐 Because BlackRock manages pension funds and government assets, even world leaders have to consider its interests.
Yes, this deal prevents a China-linked company from running the Panama Canal’s major ports, and that’s a big deal. But at what cost? We’ve simply shifted control from one foreign influence to another—one that’s just as powerful but far less accountable.
China isn’t really losing ground in Latin America—it still has deep economic roots in Panama and beyond. Meanwhile, BlackRock continues to grow its empire, quietly amassing influence over global commerce, national economies, and even government policies.
This deal might be a strategic move for U.S. influence in the region, but it also raises serious concerns about corporate power, economic sovereignty, and the unchecked influence of global finance. If BlackRock keeps expanding its control over strategic assets like ports, energy, and infrastructure, we may soon find ourselves in a world where corporations—not countries—set the rules of global trade and governance.
So while this is a win for the U.S. government, it may also be a step toward an even bigger problem: the concentration of global power in the hands of a few unelected corporate giants.
🔹 The question we should all be asking: If BlackRock already has more financial influence than most countries, how much more control are we willing to give it?
The fragile 42-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas officially collapsed Saturday night after negotiations for a second phase failed to materialize. Hamas rejected any extension of the ceasefire unless it resulted in a full Israeli withdrawal and an end to military operations—conditions Israel was never going to accept.
Israel attempted to negotiate a compromise through U.S. presidential advisor Steve Witkoff, proposing that Hamas release half of the remaining hostages—including all deceased captives—before entering into discussions about a second phase. The second phase would have included further hostage releases and a shift toward de-escalation. However, Hamas refused to engage, effectively pushing Israel back into full-scale military operations.
Israel is showing no signs of backing down, with ten brigades positioned around Gaza and prepared for extended military operations. Reports indicate that Israel has no intention of pulling out until its objectives are met—namely, the complete decimation of Hamas' military capabilities.
A recently approved $3.5 billion U.S. weapons sale to Israel includes 35,000 Mark 84 bombs, each capable of leveling buildings with a blast radius of four football fields. Additionally, 300 D9 Caterpillar bulldozers—massive machines capable of demolishing infrastructure—are being added to the Israeli arsenal. These purchases indicate that Israel is preparing for a more destructive phase of operations in Gaza.
Meanwhile, Israel continues to face near-daily terrorist attacks. In Haifa, a 70-year-old man was killed in a stabbing attack inside a shopping mall, with several others injured before the attacker was neutralized. The assailant had recently returned from abroad before launching his assault. These attacks only serve to reinforce Israel’s resolve to eliminate threats within and outside its borders.
While military operations continue, Israel is also battling a war of perception. International criticism over humanitarian aid restrictions has intensified, but Israel argues that Hamas is hoarding four to six months' worth of supplies in warehouses while claiming the population is starving. By cutting off aid, Israel is effectively putting pressure on Hamas to use its stockpiles or face responsibility for the suffering of Gazan civilians.
With Trump’s administration providing unwavering support, Israel now has a freer hand to execute its military strategy without political interference from Washington. Analysts predict that
, seeking to dismantle Hamas’ remaining strongholds. Meanwhile, tensions along the Lebanese borderremain high, with ongoing Israeli strikes targeting Hezbollah assets.
The next phase of this war appears to be a decisive push to eradicate Hamas—both militarily and structurally. The Israeli government seems committed to ensuring that Gaza is no longer a launching ground for future conflicts, even if that means completely reshaping the region.
Stay tuned for further updates as this situation continues to unfold.