Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
What a US-Iran War Could Look Like:
March 17, 2025
post photo preview
 
Let’s dive into what a war between the US and Iran might mean—no fluff, just the basics. The US wouldn’t send ground troops storming in; instead, it’d lean on air and naval power. Here’s how it could play out, how Iran might respond, and what it’d mean for the region and beyond.
The Conflict: Air Strikes, Not Ground Fights
Imagine the US launching a barrage of missiles and airstrikes from jets, ships, and drones based in the Persian Gulf or nearby countries like Qatar. The targets? Iran’s missile launchers, air defenses, and oil facilities. Navy ships would block Iran’s ports, cutting off trade, while cyberattacks could disrupt their power grid or military communications. The aim would be to weaken Iran’s forces and economy without a full-scale invasion.
Iran’s army is sizable—over 500,000 troops—but it’s built for defense, not matching US technology. Their bases and equipment would take heavy damage, though their mountainous terrain could shield some units.
Iran’s Response: Disruption Over Direct Wins
Iran wouldn’t back down quietly. They’ve got ballistic missiles capable of hitting US bases in Iraq or Bahrain, and they’ve used them before. They’d also activate their regional allies—Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Iraq, and Yemen’s Houthis—to target US interests or allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia, potentially with rocket attacks or strikes on oil infrastructure.
In the Gulf, Iran could deploy small boats and mines to harass shipping, possibly disrupting the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil chokepoint. That could push oil prices to $150 a barrel or higher. Cyberattacks on US systems or proxy-led terror strikes abroad are also in their toolkit. Their strategy would focus on creating widespread problems rather than winning a head-on fight.
Regional and Global Fallout
The effects would spread fast. Oil markets would jolt, driving up fuel and food costs worldwide. In the Middle East, conflict zones like Iraq and Syria could see intensified fighting, while refugees might pour into neighboring countries. Saudi Arabia and Israel could face direct attacks despite welcoming a weaker Iran.
China and Russia, both tied to Iran, would likely stay out of the fray militarily. China would criticize the US, secure alternative oil supplies, and look to strengthen ties with Gulf states. Russia might quietly send Iran weapons—missiles or drones—and use the situation to distract the US from other fronts, like Ukraine. Both would frame it as a chance to challenge American influence.
The Wider Impact
The US could severely damage Iran’s military, but a total knockout without ground forces is unlikely. Iran’s ability to stir trouble would keep the conflict grinding on. Rising energy costs and regional instability could strain US alliances, while giving China and Russia openings to expand their reach. If Iran feels desperate, a push toward nuclear weapons could escalate things further.
In short, a US-Iran war would hit hard, cost a lot, and leave everyone dealing with the aftermath. Thoughts? Let me know what you think below!
community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
5
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 07, 2025
Houthi Drone Strikes Israel - Two Wounded

Three Houthi drones were fired at Israel on Sunday. Two were shot down and the third struck the airport in Eilat, Wounding to his Israelis and causing the airspace to be shut down.

00:00:07
Israel fills Hamas tunnel with cement.

That’s one way to make sure it doesn’t get used again

00:00:17
Dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona
00:00:39
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Honoring the Life of Charlie Kirk.

Join us today as we reflect on Charlie’s incredible example and honor his life and legacy. His voice, courage, and unwavering stand for truth inspired countless people across this nation. While we grieve his loss, we also celebrate the eternal impact of a life lived boldly for Christ and for freedom.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKtZGro95L8?si=4RH1WgSpXwKZw8zQ

post photo preview
September 10, 2025
Charlie Kirk shot and killed at a university rally in Utah.

I’m heartsick upon landing in the US this afternoon. The first messages on my phone were about the conservative pundit Charlie Kirk being shot in the neck from 200 yards with a rifle at a speaking engagement at a university in Utah. Unfortunately, Charlie has died. He leaves behind a couple kids and a wife and a very bright future. Charlie Kirk was a warrior for the Faith and is the latest Martyr. He won’t be the last.

This is a tribute to my brothers who lost their lives on 911 i was a lucky one I survived. This is the recovery at Staten Island where the living tirelessly sifted through the rubble

September 09, 2025
post photo preview
Jerusalem Locked Down, Eilat Hit, and Gaza Heats Up: Today’s Hot Zone Brief

Mass Shooting in North Jerusalem

Time/Place: ~10:30 a.m. at the Ramot (Ramon/Rama) Junction on Jerusalem’s North side—one of those busy transfer points where multiple routes converge and buses stack up.

What happened:

  • Two attackers arrived by car, boarded a crowded bus, opened fire, then continued shooting outside.

  • The rampage lasted roughly a minute.

  • Casualties: At least 6 killed, about 20 wounded.

  • Stopped by: Two armed Israelis—reportedly ultra-Orthodox (Haredi), one an off-duty IDF commander from the new Haredi unit—neutralized the terrorists on scene.

Notes that matter:

  • Authorities believe the cell had ISIS ties, not Hamas/PIJ/Hezbollah.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
September 07, 2025
post photo preview
Venezuela’s F-16 Provocation

 The world doesn’t slow down, and neither do the threats we face. Yesterday brought a stark reminder of that when two Venezuelan F-16 fighter jets buzzed the USS Jason Dunham in international waters.

The Pentagon issued a sharp statement:

“Today, two Maduro regime military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters. This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter-narco terror operations. The cartel running Venezuela is strongly advised not to pursue any further effort to obstruct, deter, or interfere with counter narcotics and counterterror operations carried out by the U.S. military.”

That’s about as clear as it gets. Venezuela—already drowning in corruption, cartel ties, and authoritarian control—is poking the bear. The question is: what should America do about it?

The overflight wasn’t done with Russian-made Flankers, as I might have expected, but with U.S.-made F-16s. Back in the 1980s, Washington sold Caracas two dozen of them. Today, most of those planes are grounded for lack of parts and maintenance. Venezuela claims 14 are still flightworthy, but experts believe the number is closer to three.

That makes the provocation even more interesting—dusting off old American jets to fly dangerously close to one of our destroyers. And make no mistake: the Arleigh Burke-class Jason Dunham could have swatted them from the sky in seconds.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
September 04, 2025
Words Matter - Busting Lies about Gaza
What the Data Really Shows

For nearly two years, the war between Israel and Hamas has been framed in the starkest moral terms. Activists, NGOs, and even governments have accused Israel of genocide against the people of Gaza. The word “genocide” carries immense legal and moral weight — it evokes Rwanda, the Holocaust, the deliberate attempt to wipe out an entire people. But when a term this powerful is misapplied, it loses its meaning.

A new, in-depth study from the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, authored by historians, military analysts, and legal scholars, takes a hard look at the genocide allegations and finds them built on sand. The report’s aim is not to excuse Israel’s mistakes or downplay suffering in Gaza — but to sift fact from fiction.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals