Western nations don’t sound the alarm without reason. And right now? They’re telling their citizens in Iran to get out. Fast. France is one of several countries urging evacuation, and when you connect the dots, it paints a clear picture: Something big is about to go down.

For the first time, the U.S. may be preparing to strike inside Iran itself—not just against its proxies. Why? Because Iran’s fingerprints are all over the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea and Israel. And a bombshell report from the National Council of Resistance of Iran (an exiled opposition group) confirms what many already suspected: The Iranian regime is personallyoverseeing the Houthis' political and military operations.

 American drones have been actively conducting surveillance missions over strategic sites in Iran. That’s not routine. That’s target prepping.

You don’t run thousands of high-resolution images through analysis software for fun. You do it to create a target package. Refueling tankers are going up. Regional partners are quietly being briefed. The U.S. isn’t just rattling sabers—it’s pulling them out.

To avoid open conflict, Iran is trying to de-escalate—releasing a French hostage, for instance. But that won’t be enough. President Trump made it clear: Another Houthi attack on Israel equals an Iranian attack. And the Houthis fired again. The fuse has been lit.

So if you’re in Iran—and your government or embassy tells you to leave—it might be time to listen. Because if missiles do start falling, it won’t be symbolic. It’ll be decisive. And it could change everything in the region.

Watch the full video here

If you can go through your day without doing something that makes a terrorist group cheer, you're probably doing okay. That’s a solid baseline for making good decisions. Unfortunately, that’s not how a lot of our leaders seem to think. Instead, they make decisions that embolden enemies, destabilize nations, and push lies instead of truth.

Israel: Protests and Political Warfare

Right now, Israel is seeing mass protests over Prime Minister Netanyahu’s decision to fire Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar. Shin Bet is Israel’s internal security agency—think of it as their FBI. And just like our FBI, it’s been politicized beyond belief. Bar has been actively working against Netanyahu, pushing politically motivated investigations in the middle of a war. Sound familiar? In the U.S., we’ve seen the same thing—weaponized law enforcement, a justice system that protects one side while hammering the other, and media complicity every step of the way.

These Israeli protesters claim they just want hostages released. But here’s the problem: if your protest is making Hamas happy, you’re doing it wrong. Blocking roads, setting things on fire, and trying to overthrow the government while your country is at war doesn’t exactly scream “concerned citizen.” It screams “useful idiot.” And let’s not ignore the fact that a lot of these protests have the telltale signs of foreign funding. Slick signs, coordinated messaging—who’s really pulling the strings here?

The Houthi Threat and Weak U.S. Response

The Houthis just fired a ballistic missile at Israel. This comes after President Trump warned that any further attacks on Israel would mean holding Iran accountable. And yet, what happened? The missile was intercepted over Saudi Arabia, and all we got was some vague posturing on Truth Social. Iran is running the Houthis, financing their war machine, and testing how far they can push before real consequences come. How much longer before someone decides to actually do something about it?

The Ceasefire That Never Was

There’s been a lot of noise about President Trump supposedly getting Putin to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine. That is not what happened. Putin never agreed to stop the war. He agreed to “study the idea” of a ceasefire after Ukraine met a long list of absurd demands—including surrendering territory, reducing their military, and abandoning NATO aspirations. In other words, Russia will stop fighting as soon as they win the war. Not exactly a breakthrough deal.

Meanwhile, Ukraine struck back, targeting Russian energy infrastructure after another wave of Russian drone attacks. So much for a ceasefire. This war is still raging, and any talk of easy diplomatic solutions is just that—talk.

Live Not By Lies

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn once warned against living by lies. Today, that warning is more relevant than ever. The left weaponizes the truth, distorts reality, and silences those who refuse to play along. But here’s the thing—this isn’t just a left-wing problem. Too many conservatives are willing to ignore lies if they come from their side. That’s dangerous. Truth is not a political weapon. It stands on its own.

So, here’s my challenge to you: don’t live by lies. Seek the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable. Hold everyone to the same standard, no matter what letter is next to their name. Because when we abandon truth, we don’t just lose a political battle—we lose everything.

Watch the full video here 

Israel is back in Gaza with over 40 strikes against Hamas targets, the U.S. is hitting the Houthis in Yemen, and Israel is striking in Lebanon and Syria. That’s a lot of conflict in one day.

But here’s what I want to talk about: ceasefires. Specifically, why they rarely lead to the end of a war.

Ceasefires Don’t End Conflicts—Winning Does

A ceasefire sounds nice in theory. Two sides stop shooting, people get a break from the violence, and maybe, just maybe, they find a way to peace. But in reality, that’s not how wars end. Wars end when one side wins.

The idea that two reasonable parties will sit down and negotiate peace assumes that both sides are rational. But real, wars don’t start because people are reasonable. If they were, they wouldn’t have gone to war in the first place.

Take Russia and Ukraine. Russia didn’t just wake up one day and say, “Let’s have a friendly discussion.” No, they built up 250,000 troops on Ukraine’s border and then invaded. They claimed all sorts of reasons—some of which had a strategic basis—but none of which were moral, rational, or justified.

Trump, Putin, and a Pointless Phone Call

Recently, former President Trump had a call with Vladimir Putin about a ceasefire in Ukraine. It didn’t go well. Putin left Trump on hold (a power move) and later made demands that no one in the West could accept.

The Kremlin’s version of the call was very different from the U.S. version. Putin didn’t agree to a ceasefire. Instead, he said he might consider stopping attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure—but only if the West stopped all weapons shipments to Ukraine. In other words, Russia would stop targeting power plants if Ukraine essentially surrendered. That’s not a negotiation. That’s blackmail.

Russia’s Long History of Breaking Ceasefires

Let’s talk history. Russia has agreed to multiple ceasefires with Ukraine over the years. How many have lasted? Zero.

Here’s a quick rundown:

• 2014 Minsk Agreement – Broken almost immediately.

• 2015 Minsk II Agreement – Also broken.

• 2016 Ceasefires (Harvest, Easter, School-Year, Christmas) – Every single one was violated.

• 2019 Steinmeyer Formula Ceasefire – Lasted longer but still collapsed.

• 2020 Nationwide Ceasefire – This one worked for a while, but guess what? Russia used the time to build up forces before launching its full-scale invasion in 2022.

See a pattern? Russia doesn’t want a ceasefire—they want a chance to regroup and attack again later.

The Reality: Either Ukraine Wins or Russia Wins

This war doesn’t end with a handshake. There are only two possible outcomes:

1. Ukraine loses. That means 30 million people live under Russian oppression, and Russia moves on to its next target—maybe Poland or even Belarus.

2. Russia loses. And they learn a hard lesson that aggression doesn’t pay.

Right now, Russia is struggling. Ukraine is hitting Russian energy infrastructure hard, and it’s making a big impact. That’s why Putin suddenly wants to negotiate—but only on his terms.

What Should Happen Instead?

Instead of pushing for a doomed ceasefire, the U.S. should take the same stance on Ukraine that it takes on Israel: full support until victory is achieved.

If Trump really wants to make an impact, he should be telling Putin:

“We will never allow NATO to attack Russia, but we also won’t allow Russia to take territory that isn’t theirs. Until Russian troops leave Ukraine, we will use every economic tool available to collapse your war machine.”

That’s the only language Putin understands. Anything less just delays the inevitable.

Final Thoughts

Ceasefires sound good on paper, but history shows they rarely work. When dealing with aggressive, expansionist regimes like Russia, stopping the fight only gives them time to regroup and attack again later. The only way to end this war is for Ukraine to win—and the U.S. should be doing everything it can to make sure that happens.

Let me know what you think in the comments!