Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
About That Phone Call...
The White House May Be Painting Too-Rosy a Picture
March 19, 2025

Reports are that Putin kept Trump waiting for over an hour after their scheduled call time.  How does that make the US look here?

  1. Ceasefire Scope – Who Benefits?

    • Trump claims there’s an immediate ceasefire on all “Energy and Infrastructure.”
    • Putin’s readout only refers to a 30-day freeze on attacks against energy infrastructure.  There's a difference in these two claims.  
    • This disproportionately benefits Russia because:
      • Ukraine has been rebuilding its grid to be more distributed and resilient, relying on smaller power plants.
      • Russia, on the other hand, is still dependent on large, centralized oil and gas infrastructure, which has been under near-daily attack.
      • Freezing energy strikes helps Russia stabilize its economy and war funding while doing relatively little for Ukraine.
  2. Who’s Negotiating?

    • Trump’s readout suggests both Putin and Zelensky are on board.
    • Putin, however, only refers to talks between Russia and the U.S., excluding Ukraine from the process.
    • This would allow Putin to dictate terms without Ukrainian input, sidelining the country that is actually fighting the war.
  3. Peace Talks – Immediate or Indefinite?

    • Trump states negotiations will begin immediately in the Middle East.
    • Putin only expresses an intention to continue efforts—a much weaker, noncommittal statement.
    • There’s a big difference between a firm plan and vague diplomatic talk.
  4. The Unspoken Condition – U.S. Military Aid Cuts

    • Trump’s version of the call ignores Putin’s key demand:
      • That the U.S. must cut off military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine as part of the deal.
    • This would severely weaken Ukraine’s ability to defend itself and benefit Russia without requiring any real concessions from Moscow.
  5. Why Putin Wants These Terms Now

    • Ukraine has already agreed to an immediate, unconditional ceasefire—but Putin rejected it. Instead, he’s trying to reshape the deal to his advantage.
    • His requests align with Russia’s current weaknesses:
      • Ukraine has successfully crippled 15 of Russia’s 33 major refineries, hurting Putin’s ability to fund the war.
      • Ukraine’s navy has forced Russia to pull back its Black Sea fleet, making a maritime ceasefire strategically beneficial to Moscow.
      • Recent U.S. intelligence blackouts helped Russia launch surprise attacks—Putin wants to make those intelligence gaps permanent.

The Bigger Picture

Putin is not agreeing to the unconditional ceasefire that Ukraine and the U.S. previously backed. Instead, he is:

  • Protecting his war economy by stopping attacks on his energy sector.
  • Framing the deal to Western audiences as reasonable while still advancing his goals.
  • Giving Trump something to claim as a victory without making meaningful concessions.
  • Turning Ukraine’s self-defense into the “problem” instead of Russia’s ongoing invasion.

Trump presents this as a breakthrough, but in reality, it’s a strategic repositioning by Putin to shift the war in Russia’s favor while limiting Ukraine’s ability to fight back.

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
22
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 07, 2025
Houthi Drone Strikes Israel - Two Wounded

Three Houthi drones were fired at Israel on Sunday. Two were shot down and the third struck the airport in Eilat, Wounding to his Israelis and causing the airspace to be shut down.

00:00:07
Israel fills Hamas tunnel with cement.

That’s one way to make sure it doesn’t get used again

00:00:17
Dust storm in Phoenix, Arizona
00:00:39
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Honoring the Life of Charlie Kirk.

Join us today as we reflect on Charlie’s incredible example and honor his life and legacy. His voice, courage, and unwavering stand for truth inspired countless people across this nation. While we grieve his loss, we also celebrate the eternal impact of a life lived boldly for Christ and for freedom.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKtZGro95L8?si=4RH1WgSpXwKZw8zQ

post photo preview
September 10, 2025
Charlie Kirk shot and killed at a university rally in Utah.

I’m heartsick upon landing in the US this afternoon. The first messages on my phone were about the conservative pundit Charlie Kirk being shot in the neck from 200 yards with a rifle at a speaking engagement at a university in Utah. Unfortunately, Charlie has died. He leaves behind a couple kids and a wife and a very bright future. Charlie Kirk was a warrior for the Faith and is the latest Martyr. He won’t be the last.

September 10, 2025
Some of the nice colonial buildings still in use around Guyana
September 09, 2025
post photo preview
Jerusalem Locked Down, Eilat Hit, and Gaza Heats Up: Today’s Hot Zone Brief

Mass Shooting in North Jerusalem

Time/Place: ~10:30 a.m. at the Ramot (Ramon/Rama) Junction on Jerusalem’s North side—one of those busy transfer points where multiple routes converge and buses stack up.

What happened:

  • Two attackers arrived by car, boarded a crowded bus, opened fire, then continued shooting outside.

  • The rampage lasted roughly a minute.

  • Casualties: At least 6 killed, about 20 wounded.

  • Stopped by: Two armed Israelis—reportedly ultra-Orthodox (Haredi), one an off-duty IDF commander from the new Haredi unit—neutralized the terrorists on scene.

Notes that matter:

  • Authorities believe the cell had ISIS ties, not Hamas/PIJ/Hezbollah.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
September 07, 2025
post photo preview
Venezuela’s F-16 Provocation

 The world doesn’t slow down, and neither do the threats we face. Yesterday brought a stark reminder of that when two Venezuelan F-16 fighter jets buzzed the USS Jason Dunham in international waters.

The Pentagon issued a sharp statement:

“Today, two Maduro regime military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters. This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter-narco terror operations. The cartel running Venezuela is strongly advised not to pursue any further effort to obstruct, deter, or interfere with counter narcotics and counterterror operations carried out by the U.S. military.”

That’s about as clear as it gets. Venezuela—already drowning in corruption, cartel ties, and authoritarian control—is poking the bear. The question is: what should America do about it?

The overflight wasn’t done with Russian-made Flankers, as I might have expected, but with U.S.-made F-16s. Back in the 1980s, Washington sold Caracas two dozen of them. Today, most of those planes are grounded for lack of parts and maintenance. Venezuela claims 14 are still flightworthy, but experts believe the number is closer to three.

That makes the provocation even more interesting—dusting off old American jets to fly dangerously close to one of our destroyers. And make no mistake: the Arleigh Burke-class Jason Dunham could have swatted them from the sky in seconds.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
September 04, 2025
Words Matter - Busting Lies about Gaza
What the Data Really Shows

For nearly two years, the war between Israel and Hamas has been framed in the starkest moral terms. Activists, NGOs, and even governments have accused Israel of genocide against the people of Gaza. The word “genocide” carries immense legal and moral weight — it evokes Rwanda, the Holocaust, the deliberate attempt to wipe out an entire people. But when a term this powerful is misapplied, it loses its meaning.

A new, in-depth study from the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, authored by historians, military analysts, and legal scholars, takes a hard look at the genocide allegations and finds them built on sand. The report’s aim is not to excuse Israel’s mistakes or downplay suffering in Gaza — but to sift fact from fiction.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals