Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Trump Talks Nukes, Putin Flexes, and China Builds: The World Re-Arms
October 31, 2025
post photo preview

President Trump is making headlines for talking tough on nuclear weapons with Russia, and it’s worth unpacking what that really means.

Before we get there, though, there was breaking news this morning that deserves attention.

FBI Foils a Terror Plot in Michigan

The FBI says it stopped two planned terrorist attacks in Michigan, arresting multiple suspects just outside Detroit. According to Director Kash Patel, the suspects were plotting a violent assault for Halloween weekend.

One of the operations took place in Dearborn, a city that has long been home to radical Islamist enclaves. The discovery of a planned attack there isn’t surprising, but it is deeply concerning.

Credit where it’s due—Patel and the field agents made this a priority, and it appears they may have prevented a major tragedy.

 

Trump’s Nuclear Tough Talk

Now to the big story. President Trump recently announced that the United States will resume nuclear testing—or at least preparations for it.

He wrote:

“The United States has more nuclear weapons than any other country... I’ve instructed the Department of War to start testing our nuclear weapons on an equal basis with Russia. That process will begin immediately.”

Here’s the reality: Russia actually holds more total nuclear weapons than we do, particularly in tactical warheads. But the United States has more weapons ready to launch—around 1,800 compared to Russia’s 1,700.

So Trump isn’t entirely wrong, but it’s a matter of definitions. Either way, once you reach a few thousand nuclear weapons, arguing about who has more is like arguing who brought the bigger match to a fireworks factory.

Putin’s “Wonder Weapons”

Putin’s regime has been boasting about a nuclear-powered ICBM—one they claim can circle the globe indefinitely before striking its target. It sounds terrifying, but independent monitoring stations haven’t detected any such test.

This is typical Russian theater. It’s designed to project strength when reality shows weakness. The truth is, Russia’s military remains hollowed out by corruption and incompetence. Generals line their pockets while troops scavenge for spare parts. Their much-touted “superweapons” are often vaporware.

So when Trump talks tough, it’s as much about deterrence as it is about politics.

Testing Without Testing

The United States hasn’t conducted a live nuclear explosion since 1992. Russia’s last was in 1994. Modern computer simulations have made live tests unnecessary. They’re expensive, environmentally risky, and strategically unwise because they give our adversaries valuable data.

Experts say there’s no technical reason to conduct new tests. Our deterrent remains intact and ready.

The Real Threat: China

While Russia blusters, China is quietly building the largest nuclear expansion in its history. The Pentagon reports that Beijing is adding new land, sea, and air-based systems and constructing facilities to rapidly increase its warhead production.

That should concern everyone. Russia is bleeding, but China is building. And Beijing’s growth trajectory is far more deliberate—and dangerous.

Venezuela on the Radar

Meanwhile, another hotspot is heating up. Sources inside the Pentagon confirm that President Trump has ordered the identification of strike targets inside Venezuela—air bases, naval ports, and air defense systems.

Caracas has become a testing ground for Russian hardware, including its S-400 air defense systems. Moscow wants to see how their technology performs against American aircraft like the F-35 and B-1 bomber.

In short, Venezuela could become a proving ground for the next phase of global confrontation.

The Bottom Line

Nuclear rhetoric, economic turmoil, and proxy wars are reshaping the world order faster than most people realize. The new arms race isn’t about numbers—it’s about leverage, influence, and who blinks first.

But fear isn’t preparation. Wisdom is.

When governments print money, when tyrants rattle nuclear sabers, and when the media looks the other way, it’s time for ordinary people to steady themselves—financially, spiritually, and mentally.

“The smartest people don’t panic. They prepare.”

Gold and silver might safeguard your savings. Faith and community will safeguard your soul. Both matter more than ever in the uncertain days ahead.

community logo
Join the Chuck Holton Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
More Fraud - This Time in Ohio
00:01:39
Do American Students Know Anything?

Another powerful ad for home schooling.

00:01:30
Powerful

No one in Ukraine asked for this.

00:02:32
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce
Get a Signed Book from Chuck Holton with Your Annual Locals Membership – Limited Time Offer Ends Jan 1

Sign up for an annual Locals membership now through January 1st and Chuck will personally send you a signed book as a thank-you. The annual plan is currently discounted to only $5 a month, saving you $48 for the year.

To receive your book, you must join with an annual membership, then email [email protected] with your mailing address and your book choice.

Supplies are limited to what we have in stock.

https://chuckholton.locals.com/support/promo/CHRISTMAS2026

post photo preview
December 29, 2025

Be careful about these Victor Davis Hanson videos. They are AI fakes. He has been pointing them out on his real show VICTOR DAVIS HANSON, IN HIS OWN WORDS on the Daily Signal.

Did Iran really declare war on the US and Europe officially? Hmmm…

Christmas Special Live Call Link

Reminder: Live Call with Chuck Tomorrow at 12PM

Join Chuck Holton and the Hot Zone crew tomorrow, December 20th at 12PM for a special live call!

We’ll be announcing the winners of the Christmas giveaway and giving you an inside look at what’s coming next for The Hot Zone.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Three Americans Killed in Syria — and the Question Washington Doesn’t Want to Answer

Breaking news this Saturday: three Americans are dead in Syria tonight, three more are wounded, and the attack—described by U.S. Central Command as an ambush carried out by a lone ISIS gunman—has once again dragged the Syrian war back into the American consciousness for a few brief hours, which is usually all the time the public gives it before the news cycle moves on and the families are left to carry the weight alone.

 

CENTCOM says two of the dead were U.S. service members and one was an American civilian contractor, and that the attacker was engaged and killed as well, with names being withheld until next of kin are notified, which is the right thing to do; but even with those official facts in hand, I want to slow the pace down a little bit and do what I always try to do here—put this in context—because in a place like Syria, the story you get in the headline is almost never the story that explains why this happened.

I’m not interested in reporting tragedy like it’s a scoreboard, and I’m not interested in repeating a paragraph of breaking news without the background that makes it intelligible; I spent eight years in the military, and I’ve spent more than twenty years following the U.S. military across the globe—Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria included, with more than a dozen trips into Afghanistan, roughly fifteen into Iraq, and seven or so into Syria—so when Americans die in a place most people couldn’t find on a map, I feel a responsibility to show you what the map actually means.

The desert isn’t empty—ISIS hides in the “nothing”

The reported location of the attack is Palmyra—Palmira on some maps—an ancient city in central Syria that sits on the edge of a brutal expanse of desert, the kind of wide open, sun-blasted country where outsiders assume nothing lives and nothing happens, when in reality it’s exactly the kind of terrain insurgents love because “nothing” is a perfect disguise, a perfect place to move, cache weapons, blend into small villages, disappear into wadis, and wait for opportunities.

Palmyra also sits inside territory controlled by Syria’s new administration under Ahmed al-Sharaa, and if that name makes you pause, it should, because this is where Syrian politics gets complicated in the way only Syria can do: al-Sharaa rose through jihadist ranks, he has a history tied to insurgent warfare against Americans in Iraq, he was captured and held for years, and he later returned to Syria and consolidated power with strong Turkish backing—so when you hear phrases like “new Syrian administration” or “transitional government,” don’t imagine a Western-style democracy that suddenly appeared out of the sand; imagine a patchwork of militias, alliances of convenience, old enemies wearing new uniforms, and a leadership class that wants international legitimacy while carrying a past that cannot be scrubbed clean with a new suit and a new flag.

Now layer on top of that the reality that ISIS is not gone from Syria, not even close.

U.S. estimates have long suggested there are still roughly 2,000 to 3,000 ISIS fighters operating in and around the central Syrian desert, and there are far more than that if you include facilitators, family networks, financiers, and the enormous number of ISIS-linked detainees and relatives held in camps and makeshift prisons; and while that fight has mostly slipped out of the American public’s view, it continues quietly, relentlessly, week after week, because the moment pressure is relieved in a place like this, the violence doesn’t fade—it regroups.

Why American troops are still there—despite everything

The United States currently has about 900 troops in Syria, a number that matters because it tells you how thin the margin is between “containment” and “collapse,” especially when the enemy has deep local roots and decades of practice living off the land and off the grievances of the people around them; and those American troops are there for one primary purpose: to keep a lid on ISIS so we don’t wake up one day to another wave of mass executions, terror-state governance, and regional destabilization that forces the world back into a far more expensive war.

That’s the mission, and it’s not abstract; when ISIS surged the last time, the human cost was staggering, and it wasn’t paid by politicians or pundits—it was paid by Iraqi soldiers, Kurdish fighters, civilians, and yes, Americans too—and the reason our presence in Syria still functions as a deterrent is that in a powder keg region, a small, capable American footprint has a way of discouraging ambitious actors from taking the final step that turns instability into open war.

But here is the part that doesn’t get said out loud very often: the mission in Syria is increasingly tangled up in partnerships that are, at best, uneasy and, at worst, morally and strategically risky.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Dark Fleet Is Fueling the World’s Dictators — And the U.S. Might Finally Be Ready to Do Something About It

I’m coming to you today from Panama, where I’ve been digging into a story that’s far bigger than most people realize. It involves a shadowy network of ships—1,423 of them at last count—that roam the world’s oceans moving sanctioned oil for regimes like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela. Some call it the dark fleet, others the ghost fleet, but whatever the name, it’s become a lifeline for the world’s worst dictators.

Out of those 1,423 vessels, roughly 920 are sanctioned themselves. These aren’t just ships doing business in a gray area—they are part of a global ecosystem of deception, fraud, and corruption that props up authoritarian governments and undermines the international rules that keep maritime trade safe. They spoof GPS signals, turn off their transponders, swap oil with “cleaner” tankers in the dead of night, operate under shell-company ownership, and sail uninsured—floating environmental disasters just waiting to happen.

And for years, not much was done about it. But that may be changing.

Just days ago, the United States seized a massive VLCC tanker—the Skipper—carrying 1.8 million barrels of Venezuelan crude bound for Cuba. It’s a move that seems small on its own, but it hints at something larger: Washington may finally be realizing that targeting the dark fleet isn’t just desirable—it’s strategically powerful.

That raises a fascinating question: What would happen if the U.S. and its allies cracked down hard on these ghost ships—everywhere, all at once? Could it reshape global power? Could it even topple Maduro?

Let’s dig into that.

 

A Sanctions Loophole Big Enough to Sail a Tanker Through

These ghost ships function by exploiting cracks in the global maritime system. They manipulate AIS beacons, swap oil mid-ocean, hide ownership behind layers of shell companies, fly false flags, and operate without legitimate insurance. The UN’s maritime regulator has warned that these rusted, poorly maintained hulks are ticking time bombs—and we’ve already seen “Ukrainian sanctions” in action when Ukrainian sea drones blew up several shadow-fleet tankers in the Black Sea.

Imagine what happens if one of these decrepit tankers explodes in a global choke point like the Strait of Hormuz. You’d see a shock to oil markets overnight.

And yet, that’s the system that keeps Venezuela, Iran, and Russia afloat.

 

The U.S. Begins to Apply Pressure

The seizure of the Skipper wasn’t random. It’s part of a broader pressure campaign—one that former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has openly supported. He said plainly that going after these vessels is a direct way to choke off the revenue Maduro depends on to stay in power.

Pompeo also noted something key: Maduro’s regime probably has “weeks, not months” of financial runway without this illicit revenue stream. And Cuba—already experiencing rolling blackouts—relies on Venezuela for about a quarter of its total energy supply. This single tanker seizure hurts Havana even more than Caracas.

But perhaps the most important variable is geography. Satellite data reveals dozens of sanctioned tankers parked just off Venezuela’s northern coast. In theory, if the U.S. waits for them to exit Venezuela’s 200-mile EEZ, it could legally seize many of them—especially the stateless ones.

Imagine the U.S. grabbing one tanker per day.

The ripple effects would be enormous.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals