Chuck Holton
Politics • Culture • News
Is something about to break between the United States and Venezuela—or is this just more noise?
December 02, 2025
post photo preview

If you’re watching from Venezuela, Trinidad, Colombia, or anywhere in the region, you don’t need me to tell you that the temperature is rising. Airspace restrictions, warships in the Caribbean, drug boats getting blown out of the water, and now more details about that phone call between President Trump and Nicolás Maduro—all of it points in one direction:

Let’s walk through what’s really happening, why it matters, and what it might mean for the people who are going to pay the highest price if this goes sideways.

The Trump–Maduro Phone Call: No Deals Left to Make

For several days we only knew that Trump and Maduro had spoken. Now we know a lot more about what was said.

According to Trump, the call was simple and blunt. Maduro wanted a deal: Let me stay in power, let me keep control of the military, and I’ll “help” you fight drugs. In other words: keep the cartel state intact, just rebrand it a bit.

Trump’s answer? No deal.

He essentially told Maduro, You’re out of bargaining chips. You’re not in a position to negotiate. You need to leave.

Whether that was phrased as a formal ultimatum or not, the message was clear: Washington is done pretending Maduro is a normal head of state. He’s a narco-dictator sitting on a collapsing country that has become a forward operating base for Russia, China, Iran, and every Marxist mischief-maker in the hemisphere.

That kind of phone call doesn’t happen unless other pieces are already on the board: intelligence operations, military deployments, diplomatic groundwork. And those pieces are very much in motion.

 

What Venezuela Looks Like From the Inside

To understand why things feel so volatile, you have to understand what daily life actually looks like inside Venezuela right now.

Hyperinflation has turned the national currency into colorful trash. The nominal minimum wage is about one U.S. dollar a month. Nobody lives on that, of course. People survive on side hustles, multiple family members crammed into one home, whatever odd jobs they can find, and—crucially—remittances from relatives abroad.

It costs roughly $500 a month to feed a family of four decently. The average Venezuelan scrapes together maybe a third to half of that. That gap is hunger. It’s kids fainting at school. It’s medicine you can’t afford and hospitals that demand you buy your own drugs before a nurse will even hang the IV bag.

I’ve been to the border city of Cúcuta, Colombia, many times. At night the streets are lined with Venezuelan women—some as young as 13 or 14—selling the only thing they still have left to sell. Many of them are mothers with husbands back home. They’re not there because they want to be. They’re there because socialism destroyed their economy, shredded the rule of law, and shoved them into a scarcity mindset where survival trumps morality.

That’s what twenty-five years of Chavista “revolution” does. It doesn’t just wreck GDP charts. It corrodes the culture from the inside out.

So when people say, “Hey, if things are so bad, why haven’t Venezuelans overthrown Maduro?”—the short answer is: he kept just enough money flowing to keep people barely alive and too exhausted, too beaten down, and too afraid to rise up.

Which brings us to the money.

 

Who’s Keeping Maduro Afloat?

At this point, two main lifelines keep the regime from collapsing outright:

  1. Oil revenues, especially via Chevron, which pumps roughly 200,000+ barrels a day out of Venezuela under a special license. Under Trump’s terms, that money is supposed to be used mainly to pay down debt, not prop up the regime—but money is fungible. Any debt paid with Chevron cash is money Maduro doesn’t have to spend himself.

  2. Remittances, mostly from Venezuelans abroad. We’re talking $4–5 billion a year flowing back into the country. That’s a huge chunk of what keeps ordinary families from starving—and indirectly keeps Maduro in place, because it prevents the kind of total collapse that would spark an uprising.

So you have a regime that can’t feed its people, can’t keep the lights on, and still finds billions for Cuban advisers, security forces, and friendly gangs—colectivos—who do the dirty work: intimidation, disappearances, torture, and political killings.

This is the system Trump is now openly threatening.

 

The Drug War at Sea—and the Double-Tap Controversy

Layered on top of the political drama is a shooting war at sea that most Americans are barely aware of.

U.S. forces have been blowing up narco-boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific—fast craft with four or five outboard motors or semi-submersibles that exist for exactly one purpose: smuggling drugs. These vessels aren’t 10 miles off a beach; they’re 80–90 miles offshore, running dark, and moving way too fast for anyone to pretend they’re fishing boats.

The Pentagon says they know who’s on these boats, where they left from, where they’re headed, and what they’re carrying. The cartels involved have been designated foreign terrorist organizations. So the U.S. has declared this an armed conflict with those groups.

That’s why they’re using missiles instead of Coast Guard boarding parties.

The problem is the last strike, where a Washington Post story—based on anonymous sources—claims Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered a second hit on a wrecked boat where two survivors were clinging to the debris. If that’s true, and those men were no longer a threat, then under the laws of armed conflict that would cross the line into an unlawful killing.

Hegseth flatly denies giving that order. Congress has launched investigations. Until the classified intel comes out, anyone claiming to know exactly what happened is guessing.

Here’s the key point: finding out what happened, and prosecuting it if necessary, is exactly what differentiates a flawed but functioning republic from a regime like Maduro’s, where crimes by the state are covered up, not corrected.

Which brings us to the speeches.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
7
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Israel Makes a Commercial from its Critics

Love this.

00:00:49
Pahlavi Speaks Out Against Leftist Journalists

The Prince hits back at the spectacularly one-sided coverage the war is getting in Europe. Powerful stuff.

00:04:24
How easy can you be found from your online presence?

Take a look at this video and show it to your kids.

00:03:50
Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

My erstwhile field producer and cameraman Dennis Azato has accompanied me on ten years of adventures across the globe. Today he joins me in Ukraine and we spend some time remembering our many trips together.

Episode 622 - Field Producer Dennis Azato and Chuck Reminisce

THANK GOD for Republicans who fix damage done by democrats and etc. THANK GOD Henceforth for President Trump to Governor DeSantis:

post photo preview

We just wrapped up an incredible week in Panama with a group of Hot Zonians. It was a powerful time of connection, faith, and adventure.

We are excited to announce new dates for our next Panama Tour: October 14 through 19, 2027!

This is a rare opportunity to step away from the noise and spend intentional time with Chuck in a relaxed, small group setting. This is not a packed, exhausting trip. It is designed for real connection, meaningful conversations, and experiencing Panama at a pace that allows you to truly take it in.

Over six unforgettable days, you will explore the best of Panama from the vibrant energy of Panama City to the peaceful beauty of El Valle de Antón. There will be casual hikes, a beach day, visits to local hidden gems, and plenty of downtime to recharge and connect.

Trip Highlights

Quality one-on-one time with Chuck in a personal and relaxed setting
Scenic hikes, beach time, and a visit to the world-famous Panama Canal
Plenty of free time to rest, reflect, and build ...

post photo preview

We embrace servanthood because we were saved by the Greatest Servant. Therefore, to be His disciple, we must be willing to humble ourselves, and learn from Him how to serve and love like Him (Matthew 11:29). Living entirely for our heavenly Father's will and glory, as our Lord Jesus did, when He physically walked this planet.

"He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk even as He walked."
(1 John 2:6)

Live Call With Chuck Link
What Do YOU Want To Ask Chuck?

Tomorrow at 12:00 PM New York time, we are going live with Chuck for our supporter call.

So let me ask you this… what do YOU want to ask Chuck? What’s been on your mind after these last few episodes? What do you want clarity on? What are you not hearing answered anywhere else?

Drop your questions in the comments here or go back to the original post and add them there.

We’re going through all of them and pulling the best ones for the call. Don’t hold back; we can talk openly in these calls. 


Join the call here: https://meet.google.com/iqr-tope-rqz

Read full Article
post photo preview
This War Isn’t Slowing Down—And That Changes Everything

In a recent briefing, President Donald Trump made something unmistakably clear: this war is not operating on a timeline, and it is not approaching a natural pause. Instead, it is accelerating in both scope and intensity, moving beyond limited strikes into a sustained campaign that is beginning to reshape the strategic landscape of the Middle East in real time.

That reality alone should force a reassessment of how this conflict is being understood, because what may have initially appeared to be a short, decisive military operation is now evolving into something far more complex, with consequences that extend well beyond the immediate battlefield.

From Targeted Strikes to Sustained Pressure

The early phase of the war was defined by overwhelming force, as the United States and its allies executed a series of large-scale precision strikes against Iranian military infrastructure. Thousands of targets were hit, including missile systems, naval assets, and weapons production facilities, resulting in the significant degradation of Iran’s conventional military capabilities.

In addition to the air campaign, the United States implemented a sweeping naval blockade designed to isolate Iran economically and militarily, effectively placing the entirety of its coastline under surveillance and control.

At first glance, these actions created the impression of a decisive and controlled campaign, one in which the outcome seemed largely predetermined by the imbalance of military power.

But wars are rarely decided in their opening phase.

A War That Has Moved to the Sea

What has emerged more recently—and what the latest developments highlight—is a shift toward a more dangerous and unpredictable phase centered on maritime conflict.

The Strait of Hormuz, one of the most strategically critical waterways in the world, has become a focal point of confrontation, with Iranian forces targeting commercial vessels and attempting to disrupt global shipping lanes. In response, the United States has escalated its posture, ordering naval forces to take direct and lethal action against Iranian boats engaged in mine-laying operations.

This directive represents more than a tactical adjustment; it signals a transition into a more aggressive and persistent form of engagement, one that increases the likelihood of miscalculation and rapid escalation.

The presence of multiple U.S. warships, aircraft, and mine-clearing operations in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation, as does the growing number of incidents involving attacks on commercial shipping.

What is unfolding in the Strait is not a sideshow—it is a central front in a conflict that now directly impacts global trade and energy markets.

Why Dominance Does Not Equal Resolution

Despite the clear military advantage held by the United States, there are signs that the conflict is entering a phase where superiority alone may not be enough to achieve a decisive outcome.

Iran’s naval capabilities have been severely degraded, and a large portion of its military infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed.

And yet, the continued ability of Iranian forces to disrupt shipping, deploy mines, and conduct asymmetric attacks reveals a deeper truth about modern warfare: even a weakened adversary can remain dangerous when it adapts its strategy.

This is particularly evident in the use of small, fast-attack boats and decentralized tactics, which allow Iran to operate in ways that are difficult to fully counter through conventional means.

In other words, the battlefield has shifted from one of direct confrontation to one of persistent disruption.

The Strategic Stakes Are Global

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
The War Is Expanding in Ways Most People Still Don’t Understand

When you look at a war from a distance, it often appears as a series of disconnected events—headlines that flare up for a moment before being replaced by the next crisis—but when you step closer, when you begin to follow the patterns instead of the noise, you start to see something else entirely taking shape.

That’s where we are right now.

Natanz (satellite view)
Natanz (satellite view)

 

Because what’s happening in the Middle East is no longer just a regional conflict or a contained military campaign; it is evolving into something broader, something more complex, and something that carries consequences far beyond the battlefield itself.

And yet, much of the world still hasn’t caught up to that reality.

 

A Campaign That Looks Decisive—On the Surface

From a strictly military perspective, the United States and its allies have demonstrated overwhelming capability in the early phase of this conflict, applying sustained pressure across multiple domains in a way that has steadily degraded Iran’s ability to operate as it once did.

Precision strikes have targeted key infrastructure, weapons systems, and logistical networks, while naval and air forces have established a level of dominance that allows for continued operations with relatively limited resistance.

In the span of weeks, thousands of targets have been hit, and the cumulative effect of those strikes is beginning to show, not just in the reduction of missile and drone activity, but in the overall tempo of Iran’s response.

There are fewer launches, fewer coordinated attacks, and more signs that the system is being strained.

From the outside, it looks like momentum is clearly on one side.

But that is only part of the story.

 

The Reality Beneath the Surface

Wars are rarely decided by what happens in the opening phase, and they are almost never as simple as they appear in the early days when one side seems to hold a decisive advantage.

Because beneath the visible structures—the bases, the launchers, the facilities—there exists a deeper layer of power that is far more difficult to dismantle.

In Iran’s case, that layer is not confined to a single institution or location; it is distributed across a network of political, military, and economic forces that are designed to function even under extreme pressure.

The clerical leadership provides ideological continuity, the civilian government maintains a façade of governance, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps operates as the backbone of real authority, controlling not only military assets but significant portions of the country’s economic infrastructure.

This is not a system that collapses simply because key targets are destroyed. It adapts. It absorbs damage. And it continues.

 

Why Air Power Has Limits

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals